PROTECTED NUTRIENT TECHNOLOGY FOR CROSSBRED CATTLE
Authored By Dr. S.H. Mane, Dr. Y. G. Fulpagare
Hardback
eChapter
The feeding management plays an important role in sustaining higher milk production in high producing dairy animals and especially nutrition during transition period of dairy animals during 3 weeks prior and 3 weeks after parturition is critically important to health, production and profitability of dairy. Nutrition and management of cows during the transition period has received tremendous interest in recent years in developed countries but relatively less attention is being paid in the developing countries like India. With understanding of role of energy and protein nutrition in managing the transition period some technologies like protected fat and protein alone or in combination has been practiced by few dairy farmers but many are still ignorant about it. The experimental results obtained with the use of these technologies have been discussed in greater depth in this book with emphasis on its profitable effect on early lactation performance and post partum reproduction. The role of energy nutrients as by pass fat and protein as by pass protein in isolation and in combination has also been discussed in the light of regaining the positive energy balance state after the parturition and its association with increased milk yield and improved post partum reproduction
Foreword
Acknowledgements
List of Tables
List of Colour Plates
List of Figures
Abbreviations
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Review of Literature
2.1 Role of the Protected Fat
2.2 Methods of Fat Protection
2.3 Level of Supplementation of Bypass Fat
2.4 Effect of Protected Fat on Dry Matter Intake
2.5 Effect of Protected Fat on Digestibility of Nutrients
2.6 Effect of Protected Fat on Nutrient Intake
2.7 Effect of Protected Fat on Body Weight and Body Condition Score
2.8 Effect of Protected Fat on Milk Yield
2.9 Effect of Protected Fat on Milk Composition
2.10 Effect of Protected Fat on Fatty acid profile
2.11 Effect of Protected Fat on Reproduction
2.12 Effect of Protected Fat on Various Blood Parameters
2.13 Effect of Protected Fat on Economics of Milk Production
2.14 Protected Protein
2.15 Methods of Protein Protection
2.16 Effect of Protected Protein on Dry Matter Intake
2.17 Effect of Protected Protein on Digestibility of Nutrients
2.18 Effect of Protected Protein on Nutrient Intake
2.19 Effect of Protected Protein on Body Weight Change and Body Condition Score
2.20 Effect of Protected Protein on Milk Yield
2.21 Effect of Protected Protein on Milk Composition
2.22 Effect of Protected Protein on Fatty Acid Profile
2.23 Effect of Protected Protein on Reproduction
2.24 Effect of Protected Protein on Various Blood Parameters
2.25 Economics of Protected Protein Feeding
2.26 Protected Fat and Protein
2.27 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Dry Matter Intake
2.28 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Digestibility of Nutrients
2.29 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Nutrient Intake
2.30 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Body Weight and Body Condition Score
2.31 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Milk Yield
2.32 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Milk Composition
2.33 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Fatty Acid Profile
2.34 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Reproduction
2.35 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein on Various Blood Parameters
2.36 Economics of Protected Fat and Protein Feeding
3. Material and Methods
3.1 Selection and Distribution of Animals
3.2 Treatment Details
3.3 Preparation of Protected Protein
3.4 Protected Fat
3.5 Observations Recorded
3.6 Statistical Analyses
4. Results and Discussion
4.1 Composition of Concentrate Mixture
4.2 Proximate Composition of Feed Ingredients and Concentrate Mixture
4.3 Body Weight of Experimental Animals During Experimental Period
4.4 Body Weight Changes During Experimental Period
4.5 Body Condition Score (BCS) Changes
4.6 Calving Performance
4.7 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility
4.8 Effect on Nutrient Intake
4.9 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein Supplementation on Milk Production(Kg/Day) and Milk Composition
4.10 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein Supplementation on Reproductive Performance
4.11 Effect of Protected Fat and Protein Supplementation on Blood Parameters
4.12 Economics of Feeding Protected Fat and Protein in Crossbred Cows
5. Summary and Conclusions
5.1 Proximate Chemical Analysis
5.2 Body Weight Changes During Experimental Period
5.3 Body Condition Score during Experimental Period
5.4 Calving Performance
5.5 Digestibility Coefficient of Experimental Feed
5.6 Nutrient Intake
5.7 Milk Yield
5.8 Milk Composition
5.9 Reproduction Performance
5.10 Blood Parameters
5.11 Economic
Conclusions
6. Literature Cited
Colour Plates
Appendix
Acknowledgements I feel extremely honoured for the opportunity bestowed upon me to work under the versatile guidance of my honourable research guide Dr. Y. G. Fulpagare, Senior Scientist, RCDP on cattle and I/C Head, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri. Indeed, my indebtedness to him becomes unquantifiable for his personal interest and scholastic guidance, constant encouragement and constructive criticism throughout the course of this investigation and presentation of this dissertation. I am highly obliged to Dr. B. R. Ulmek, Director of Instructions and Dean, Faculty of Agriculture, M. P. K. V., Rahuri for providing necessary facilities and supports during the course of my study in the University. I would also like to place on record my sincere thanks and deep sense of gratitude to the members of Advisory Committee, Dr. S. D. Mandakmale, Senior Scientist, AICRP on Goat (Sangamneri) field unit, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. D. K. Deokar, Assistant Dairy Cattle Breeder, RCDP on cattle, M.P.K.V., Rahuri and Dr. C.A. Nimbalkar, Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economic and Statistics, M.P.K.V., Rahuri for their valuable guidance and help during my course of investigation.
The livestock sector is one of the fastest growing agriculture sub sector in India, which accounted for about 17% of the value of agriculture output in 1981-83, has gradually increased by to 25% in 2011-2012 (CSO 2011, GOI). India possesses one of the largest livestock populations in the world with 218 million cattle, 115.4 million buffalos, 160 million goat, 75 million sheep, 9.4 million pigs, 947 million poultry (FAO, 2012) which provide excellent opportunities and boost rural income and alleviation of poverty. The country has 16.5% cattle, 56.8% buffalo, 5.78% sheep and 14.76% goat population of the world. India stands first in milk production likely to be touch142.6 MT in 2014 with 4.5% annual growth rate of milk.
In recent years, there has been a considerable interest in the new technological interventions for enhanced livestock productivity in the Indian sub-continent, because of the increased demand for livestock products for human consumption. Bypass nutrients defined as a nutrients fed in such a form that provides an increase in the flow of the nutrient (s) unchanged to the abomasum, yet is available to the more important nutrient (high BV) should escape from the rumen or face minimum ruminal fermentation. The reasons for protecting different nutrients are based on their mode of utilization in the rumen. The literature on the effect of the bypass fat and protein on nutrient utilization, milk production and reproductive performance has been reviewed and presented in following subheads
The present experiment entitled, “Protected Nutrient Technology for Crossbred Cattle” was conducted at Research Cum Development Project on Cattle, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri Dist. Ahmednagar, India located at 19o 23’ 0" N and 74o 39’ 0" E at an altitude of 511 mtr. Minimum and maximum ambient temperature range from 10 to 20ºC in winter and 30 to 40°C in summer with annual rainfall of 561.6 mm
4.1 Composition of Concentrate Mixture The ingredient composition of experimental concentrate mixture is presented in Table 3. Groundnut cake in T1 and T3 were treated with formaldehyde as a tool of protein protection while protected fat at the rate of 10g per liter milk production per animal in T2 and T3 was added in concentrate mixture before feeding every day.
Twenty four crossbred cows in second to fourth lactation with most probable production ability (MPPA) of average approximately 2300 liter milk production per lactation for each group were selected from the herd maintained at RCDP on Cattle. The experimental animals were randomly divided into four treatment groups of 6 in each. Control group (T0) was fed with 2/3 DM through roughages (2/3 from dry roughages and 1/3 from green roughages) + 1/3 DM from concentrate mixture (Conc. Mix includes 20% GNC (untreated). T1 group was feed with 2/3 DM through roughages (2/3 from dry roughages and 1/3 from green roughages) + 1/3 DM from concentrate mixture (Conc. Mix includes 20% GNC treated with formaldehyde (FA) @ 1.0 g FA/100g CP).
Ambasankar, K. and Balakrishnan, V. 2011. Influence of protected sardine oil on in vitro rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility of complete diet. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 81(1): 84-86. Amrutkar, S.A., Thakur, S.S. and Pawar, S.P. 2014. Economics of supplementing rumen protected methionine and lysine in the ration of lactating crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 31 (1) : 14-19. AOAC, 2005. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC. Arewad, G. R., Thube, H. A., Pandya, P. R., Parnerkar S. and Shankhpal S. 2011. Effect of feeding bypass protein based total mixed ration on performance of growing crossbred calves. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 2011.28 (3) : 303-308.
Colour Plates Chapter 3: Material and Methods
Keywords
feeding management, high milk production, dairy animals, transition period, nutrition, dairy herd, developed countries, developing countries, technologies, lactation performance, energy balance, protein, post-partum reproduction, experimental results, veterinary consultation