0 Start Pages
Preface
The last couple of decades have witnessed a tremendous research initiative in developing new quantitative methods and models for earth science. The advent of powerful com puters equipped with sophisticated mathematical and statistical tools has inspired geo-scientists to attempt more objective interpretation of their data. The earth science data are typically either too numerous or too sparse and are rarely complete. It is thus often difficult to identify a definitive pattern in them or to arrive at a comprehensive abstraction. The recent availability of mathematical and statistical tools, customized for such data sets, provides the opportunity for more objective analyses. Active research is presently underway to devise newer methodologies for analyzing data that were traditionally considered unsuitable for quantitative treatment. The geometry of geological features, that often provide important clues to their formative process, is one such example. Recent advances in the field of Geographical Information Science are now providing a bounty of potential tools for objective analysis of geometry and spatial interrelationship.
With the help of new technologies, it is now possible to study the earth processes that were beyond the scope of observation due problems with their rate, scale or accessibility. Where direct observation is yet not feasible, sophisticated numerical models for explaining geological phenomena are now made increasingly available. By embedding our knowledge of the geological processes in a logical framework, these models allow us to explore areas where our understanding of these processes are flawed or weak, towards which new research efforts are to be directed. On the other hand, a holistic approach to understand earth requires integrating observations from many different sources. The new technologies have helped this process by providing the facility of sharing earth science data over intranet and Internet. This in turn necessitated development of exclusive standards, protocols and strategies to manage collaborative exchange of data.
It is difficult to encompass this whole wave of new developments in a single book. However, the seven original research papers presented here provide the reader with a glimpse of new quantitative methods and numerical models that are presently used to interpret the earth in a more meaningful way. In the first two chapters Mukul and his co-workers and Mallick and her co-workers demonstrate how the geographic positioning system, that can measure plate motions with unprecedented accuracy, may be used in understanding crustal deformations in eastern Himalayas. The detail of a numerical model to study the relationship between crustal shortening and the resulting rock fabrics, developed by Mitra and his co-authors, is given in the third chapter. In the fourth chapter Purkait shows how statistical analysis of modern river sand helps in understanding fluvial transport mechanisms. Dutta and his co-workers propose a new quantitative technique for comparative study of bone geometry of archaic species in chapter five. In the sixth chapter Porwal and his co-authors demonstrate how zones of mineralization can be identified from earth science data sets with the help of GIS techniques. In the seventh chapter, Saha and his co-authors address the methodologies and strategies adopted for enterprise level earth science data collaboration and management tasks.
I would like to thank F. P. Agterberg (GSC, Canada), A. Aoudia (ASICTP, Trieste Italy), P. Banerjee (WIHG, Dehradun, India), P. Bourke (UWA, Crawley, Australia), S. Chatterjee (Minnesota), P. Dasgupta (Presidency College, Kolkata, India), B. L. Deekshatulu (Hyderabad), J. Ghosh (Purdue), R. W. King (MIT), B. Köbben (ITC, The Netherlands), G. Mitra (Rochester), D. K. Mukhopadhyay (IIT, Roorke, India), T. Munshi (CEPT University, Ahmedabad), S. Purkayastha (ISI, Kolkata, India), K. Rajendran (IISc., Bangalore), S. Sikdar (George Mason University, Washington D. C.), L. P. Singh (Hyderabad), J. S. Steyer (Paris) and others for reviewing the manuscripts and their constructive suggestions. I am grateful to the authors for their cooperation. I thank D. P. Sangupta and C. Chakraborty and my other colleagues for their help and encouragements.
Preface
The last couple of decades have witnessed a tremendous research initiative in developing new quantitative methods and models for earth science. The advent of powerful com puters equipped with sophisticated mathematical and statistical tools has inspired geo-scientists to attempt more objective interpretation of their data. The earth science data are typically either too numerous or too sparse and are rarely complete. It is thus often difficult to identify a definitive pattern in them or to arrive at a comprehensive abstraction. The recent availability of mathematical and statistical tools, customized for such data sets, provides the opportunity for more objective analyses. Active research is presently underway to devise newer methodologies for analyzing data that were traditionally considered unsuitable for quantitative treatment. The geometry of geological features, that often provide important clues to their formative process, is one such example. Recent advances in the field of Geographical Information Science are now providing a bounty of potential tools for objective analysis of geometry and spatial interrelationship.
With the help of new technologies, it is now possible to study the earth processes that were beyond the scope of observation due problems with their rate, scale or accessibility. Where direct observation is yet not feasible, sophisticated numerical models for explaining geological phenomena are now made increasingly available. By embedding our knowledge of the geological processes in a logical framework, these models allow us to explore areas where our understanding of these processes are flawed or weak, towards which new research efforts are to be directed. On the other hand, a holistic approach to understand earth requires integrating observations from many different sources. The new technologies have helped this process by providing the facility of sharing earth science data over intranet and Internet. This in turn necessitated development of exclusive standards, protocols and strategies to manage collaborative exchange of data.
It is difficult to encompass this whole wave of new developments in a single book. However, the seven original research papers presented here provide the reader with a glimpse of new quantitative methods and numerical models that are presently used to interpret the earth in a more meaningful way. In the first two chapters Mukul and his co-workers and Mallick and her co-workers demonstrate how the geographic positioning system, that can measure plate motions with unprecedented accuracy, may be used in understanding crustal deformations in eastern Himalayas. The detail of a numerical model to study the relationship between crustal shortening and the resulting rock fabrics, developed by Mitra and his co-authors, is given in the third chapter. In the fourth chapter Purkait shows how statistical analysis of modern river sand helps in understanding fluvial transport mechanisms. Dutta and his co-workers propose a new quantitative technique for comparative study of bone geometry of archaic species in chapter five. In the sixth chapter Porwal and his co-authors demonstrate how zones of mineralization can be identified from earth science data sets with the help of GIS techniques. In the seventh chapter, Saha and his co-authors address the methodologies and strategies adopted for enterprise level earth science data collaboration and management tasks.
I would like to thank F. P. Agterberg (GSC, Canada), A. Aoudia (ASICTP, Trieste Italy), P. Banerjee (WIHG, Dehradun, India), P. Bourke (UWA, Crawley, Australia), S. Chatterjee (Minnesota), P. Dasgupta (Presidency College, Kolkata, India), B. L. Deekshatulu (Hyderabad), J. Ghosh (Purdue), R. W. King (MIT), B. Köbben (ITC, The Netherlands), G. Mitra (Rochester), D. K. Mukhopadhyay (IIT, Roorke, India), T. Munshi (CEPT University, Ahmedabad), S. Purkayastha (ISI, Kolkata, India), K. Rajendran (IISc., Bangalore), S. Sikdar (George Mason University, Washington D. C.), L. P. Singh (Hyderabad), J. S. Steyer (Paris) and others for reviewing the manuscripts and their constructive suggestions. I am grateful to the authors for their cooperation. I thank D. P. Sangupta and C. Chakraborty and my other colleagues for their help and encouragements.