eChapters

Abstract

There are two distinct types of oscillations in global oceans, separated in their frequencies by the period of the pendulum day. One species is the gravity waves and the other is the rotational waves, associated with earth’s rotation. Both these species can be found in tidal records around islands as well as near coastlines. These two types of modes are usually found in the tsunami records on tide gauges. The tide gauge records as well as visual descriptions of the water levels during and after the occurrence of a tsunami clearly show the presence of these oscillations. During the tsunami of 26th December 2004 in the Indian Ocean, media reports suggested high water levels persisted around the Andaman and Nicobar Islands for several days. These persistent high water levels can be explained by invoking the existence of trapped and partially leaky modes on the shelves surrounding these islands.

Keywords: Oscillations in global waves, Tsunami (2004), Andaman and Nicobar islands.

Remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have emerged as critical tools in modern agriculture and weather intelligence. Their integration has revolutionized how we monitor, analyze, and manage not only food production but also urban development, natural resource conservation, and climate adaptation. In this chapter, we explore the fundamentals of remote sensing, the use of diverse sensing technologies (including satellite imagery, radar, LiDAR, and thermal imaging), and the incorporation of advanced data analytics and machine learning. We also examine GIS integration for spatial analysis and mapping, discuss emerging technologies like unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, and address economic, ethical, and policy considerations. Real-world case studies illustrate the practical applications of these technologies, while discussions on future directions highlight opportunities for continued innovation. Food production systems and its management today face unprecedented challenges—from climate variability and resource scarcity to urban expansion and shifting ecosystems. To address these challenges, modern strategies increasingly depend on synthesizing high-resolution environmental data with advanced spatial analysis. Remote sensing technologies provide a bird’s-eye view of vast landscapes, while GIS platforms enable efficient management and interpretation of these datasets. The integration of these technologies supports a host of applications, including real-time monitoring of weather phenomena, predictive modeling of environmental impacts, and strategic planning for sustainable development. With emerging trends such as drone-based monitoring, IoT sensor networks, and AIdriven analytics, the potential for remote sensing and GIS to transform weather intelligence and environmental management is growing exponentially. This chapter provides both the technical foundation and applied perspectives necessary to understand and leverage these powerful tools.

Abstract
Agriculture is a critical sector that impacts global food security, economic stability, and environmental sustainability. The advancement of agriculture relies heavily on the active involvement and collaboration of various stakeholders, including farmers, government agencies, private sector players, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and academic institutions. This chapter explores the multifaceted roles of these stakeholders in driving agricultural innovation, policy development, and sustainable practices. Through an analysis of stakeholder interactions and contributions, the chapter highlights key areas where collaboration is essential for advancing agriculture. Case studies and real-world examples are used to illustrate the impact of stakeholder engagement on agricultural outcomes. The chapter concludes by discussing the challenges and opportunities associated with stakeholder collaboration and offers recommendations for enhancing collective efforts in agriculture.
Keywords: Agriculture, stakeholders, innovation, policy development, sustainable practices, collaboration, food security, economic stability, environmental sustainability.

Governments play a pivotal role in fostering CRRD by formulating policies, mobilizing resources, and promoting sustainable practices to enhance rural resilience. Governments in CMCs are central to designing and implementing policies that integrate climate resilience into rural development. 4.1.1 Policy Frameworks for Climate Resilience National adaptation plans (NAPs) and climate- focused agricultural policies are critical tools. For instance, Bangladesh's National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) prioritizes climate- resilient crops and coastal embankments to protect rural communities from salinity intrusion (MoEF, Bangladesh 2005). Similarly, India's National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture promotes climate-smart farming techniques like zero-tillage and drought-resistant seeds (MoAFW, India 2023). These policies align with CIRDAP's mission to foster sustainable rural development by addressing region-specific

Introduction

The agricultural landscape is not just about cultivating fields; it's a narrative woven with resilience, dedication, and untold stories of women who have been the backbone of this fundamental sector for centuries. Their contributions, often overlooked or undervalued, are the bedrock of agricultural sustenance worldwide. Throughout history, women have played multifaceted roles in agriculture, nurturing crops, tending to livestock, and managing households while being instrumental in the evolution of farming practices. Despite their pivotal roles, societal norms and systemic biases have marginalized their contributions, limiting access to resources, land ownership, education, and decision-making power.

ABSTRACT

Science essentially involves confronting our ‘models’ of nature, against data from the real world, in a continuous effort to refine our knowledge of the system under study. Scientific monitoring of animal populations is therefore best viewed in the context of questions such as why monitor, what to monitor and how to monitor.

Abstract

Pruning is the most important cultural operations in tea cultivation. Time of pruning affects health of bush, incidence of pests and disease, yield and distribution of crop. Root starch reserve at the time of pruning affects the recovery of bush and hence considered as the most crucial factor for deciding time of pruning. Downward movement of photosynthates was found maximum in December and January, thereby maximizing the starch reserve in roots. Maximum recovery of tea bush and minimum loss in annual crop was found when pruned during December – January. Pruning in remaining months (February – November ) may result in crop loss to the tune of 5 per cent – 37 per cent in plain areas. Clonal varieties differ in root starch accumulation during winter months hence pruning time of individual clone needs to be decided accordingly to enhance recovery of plants.

Abstract

With categories including food, building materials, medicinal plants and resins, non-wood forest products are the economically important face of biodiversity. Using non-wood forest products to generate income and alleviate poverty requires different approaches to their special characteristics. Among the features that distinguish non-wood forest products from other goods are the unpredictability of the quantities available, the lack of control of collectors over their growth conditions, and the difficulty of ensuring that the products can be placed on the market efficiently. In developed countries such as Finland, with under-harvesting of non-wood forest products, getting an economic benefit from these involves the seasonal migration of collectors. The latter is illustrated by the case of Thai in a working visit to Finland, to pick the often underutilized wild berry harvest in Lapland. The majority of the workers are from farming backgrounds, but there is a weak positive correlation between their non-wood forest product activity in Thailand and berry picking in Finland.

The Seed Act 1966 was passed by the Indian Parliament on 29th December 1966 and it came into force from 2^nd October, 1969. In addition, Seed Regulation Order was also passed in December 1983. The sole objective of Seed Act and Order has been to ensure that the Indian farmers get good quality seeds of important crops. Important provisions and guidelines for the farmers are given below:

The Act is applicable for the seeds notified by the Central Government from time to time.

Seed quality is regulated at two stages viz. seed production and seed certification. For this purpose, seed testing laboratories and seed certification agencies are to be established in each state. Maharashtra has been the first state to implement this act. Now all the states have implemented this act.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventeenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:

Short Title, Extent and Commencement
    1.    (1) This Act may be called the Seeds Act, 1966.
        (2) It extends to the whole of India. 
        (3) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by   notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, and different dates may be appointed for different provisions of this Act, and for different States or for different areas thereof.

Part I - Preliminary

    1.    Short title. – These rules may be called the Seeds Rules, 1968. 
    2.    Definitions. – In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,- 
        (a) “Act” means the Seeds Act, 1966 (54 of 1966); 
        (b) “advertisement” means all representations other than those on the label, disseminated in any manner or by any means relating to seed for the purposes of the Act; 
        (c)  “certification sample” means a sample of seed drawn by a certification agency or by a duly authorised representative of a certification agency established under section 8 or recognized under section 18 of the Act; 
        (d) “certification tag” means a tag or label of certain design to be specified by the certification agency and shall constitute the certificate granted by the certification agency; 

Preliminary

1. Short title and extent

1. This Order may be called the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983
2. It extends to the whole of India
3. It shall come into force on the 30th December, 1983

An Act to provide for regulating the quality of certain seeds for sale, and for matters connected therewith. It enacted by Parliament in the Seventeenth Year of the Republic of India.

1. Short Title, Extent and Commencement

• This Act may be called the Seeds Act, 1966.
• It extends to the whole of India.
• It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, and different dates may be appointed for different provisions of this Act, and for different States or for different areas thereof.

THE SEEDS BILL, 2004
A
BILL
 to provide for regulating the quality of seeds for sale, import and  export and to facilitate production and supply of seeds of quality and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

A bill to provide for regulating the quality of seeds for sale, import and export and to facilitate production and supply of seeds of quality and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Be it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-Fifth Year of the Republic of India as follows

Part I - Preliminary

1. Short title: These rules may be called the Seeds Rules, 1968
2. Definitions: In these rules, unless the contest otherwise requires.

7.1 Introduction 
The global economy of today magnifies the extend and scope of product safety issues for a wide range of items, from food and medicine to consumer goods, medical devices, and automobiles (Marucheck et al., 2011). Industrial globalization has raised awareness of the many risks and vulnerabilities that goods face as they move through the supply chain, from design and sourcing to manufacturing, shipping, distribution, and ultimate sale to the end user (Milovanovi? et al., 2017). These challenges necessitate the implementation of reliable and sustainable methods for producing goods. This can be achieved via biorefineries, which may reduce supply chain disruptions while promoting environmentally friendly resource utilization. Biorefineries are usually referred to as first and second generation biorefineries with accordance to the raw material utilized. The former uses food crop as raw material wherein the latter utilizes lignocellulosic and agricultural residues as raw material for generation of value-added products (Guo et al., 2015). Additionally, algae biomass is utilized in the third generation biorefineries (Parajuli et al., 2015). However, among these three the first generation are the most established while the second and third are still developing at various stages due to technical and economic challenges (Gerssen-Gondelach et al., 2014). Globally, ethanol biorefinery processing U.S. corn and Brazilian sugarcane dominate production contributing 52% and 28%, respectively (Renewable Fuels Association, 2023). These biorefineries are further distinguished based on categories such as sugars, oils and syngas which serve as key intermediates in production of bioethanol, glycerol or lactic acid (Calvo-Flores and Martin- Martinez, 2022). Additionally, these biorefineries utilizes feedstock and residues which can be derived from forest, sugar crops and oil crops. The processing technologies employing for utilization of such raw material are fermentation, gasification and pyrolysis. This configuration of biorefinery determines the integration and systematic pathway from raw feedstock to final product (Aristizábal?Marulanda et al., 2019). Furthermore, both the supply chain and value chain are significant part of biorefineries. The value chain stands for the value-oriented aspect of the process which is often derived by customer demand and include product innovation, marketing and value development (Sharma et al., 2013). In contrast, the supply chain focuses on the logistical flow of materials, encompassing the movement of raw materials from suppliers to end consumers. However, certain stages of supply chain overlap with biorefinery systems such as separate pretreatment and fermentation facilities (Sutduean et al., 2019). The design of biorefinery system involves a structural decision process at strategic, tactical and operational levels. These decisions are made with respect to various biohazards at each level. The macro-level strategic decisions, address long-term risk mitigating strategies to ensure overall safety (Chaturvedi et al., 2020). Once the high-level decisions are established, tactical and operational decisions are implemented. The tactical decisions focus on implementing safety measures with processes such as handling hazardous materials and optimizing biorefinery. While

The social area analysis model of urban structure incorporates all three aspects of city structure, namely concentric zones, sectors and multiple nuclei. It is a more comprehensive statement of urban forms. The model was developed by R.A. Murdie in 1969. According to this model, the physical space of streets, buildings and roads are superimposed by three dimension of social space (Fig. 8.1). The social criteria are the following:

Family Status

Family status indicators include population and age variables, house ownership and age characteristics, family size and marital status and other life cycle. These exhibit a concentric zonal or ring pattern with older, smaller renter households located near the city centre and owner occupied newer larger family households near the outer fringe.

Economic Status

Economic status tends to include measure of income, occupation and education. This portrays a distinct sectoral pattern with definite high income and low income sectors.

Introduction

The Indian dairy industry plays a vital role in the nation’s economic and social fabric, deeply connected to the livelihoods of millions of rural families. It is more than just a source of income; for many small-scale and marginalized farmers, it provides a lifeline, ensuring stability and sustenance in areas where opportunities are often scarce. At the same time, the industry faces the immense responsibility of balancing economic growth with ethical practices, environmental conservation, and the welfare of the communities it serves. In this complex environment, businesses operating within the dairy sector have the potential to make a meaningful difference, but only if they prioritize social responsibility alongside profitability. By embracing sustainable practices and fostering inclusivity, these enterprises can address critical challenges while contributing to a more equitable and resilient industry (Christie, 2020; Rotz et al., 2020; Clay et al., 2019).

For the dairy industry, social responsibility is not an abstract concept; it is a pressing need. Across India, small-scale farmers form the backbone of this sector, especially in rural regions where economic vulnerability is widespread. These farmers often face numerous challenges, including fluctuating milk prices, limited market access, and a lack of resources to improve productivity (Kamath et al., 2019; Sadashive et al., 2017). Businesses in the dairy sector can act as catalysts for change by creating fairer systems, empowering marginalized groups, and ensuring that ethical treatment of livestock becomes standard practice. Beyond its immediate economic impact, the industry has a profound role to play in addressing broader social issues, such as gender inequality and food security, while promoting sustainable development that benefits everyone involved (Jaiswal, 2018; Garai et al., 2019).