eChapters

Key Facts
    
·    The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) defines ‘climate change’ as a ‘Change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over the comparable time periods’.
    
·    The main green house gases (GHGs) that have caused the global climate change or global warming are carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O).
    
·    CO₂ is the principal anthropogenic GHG that affects the earth’s radiative balance. It is the reference gas against which other GHGs are measured and therefore has a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 1. CH₄ and N₂O have a GWP of 21 and 310 respectively.
    
·    CO₂ is responsible for most of the enhanced green house effect of more than 50%, CH₄ for about 10-15% and N₂O for about 8%.
    
·    The global atmospheric concentrations of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O have increased since 1750. While CO₂ increased from a pre-industrial value of 280 ppm to 379 ppm in 2005, CH₄ increased from 715 ppb to 1774 ppb and N₂O increased from 270 ppb to 319 ppb during the same period.

5.1    Population Growth
    
5.2    Exponential Growth
    
5.3    Population Explosions
    
5.4    Over Population
    
5.5     The Causes of Rapid Population Growth
    
5.6    Ways and Means to Solve Over Population
    
5.7    Environment and Health
    
5.8    Family Welfare Programme
    
5.9    Human Rights
    
5.10    Child Welfare
    
5.11    Women Welfare

4.1    Urban Issues
    
4.2    Environmental Ethics - Issues and Possible Solutions
    
4.3    Water Conservation
    4.3.1 Rainwater Harvesting
    
4.4    Greenhouse Gases and their Sources
    4.4.1 Climate Change
    4.4.2 Global Warming
    4.4.3 The Greenhouse Effect
    4.4.4 Consequences of the Greenhouse Effect
    4.4.5 Acid Rain, 176
    
4.5    Ozone Layer Depletion
    
4.6    Nuclear Accidents
    
4.7    Waste Reclamation
    
4.8    Consumerism and Waste
    
4.9    Forest (Conservation) Act 1980
    
4.10    Wildlife Protection Act
    
4.11    The Air  (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981
    
4.12    Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974
    4.13    The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
    4.14    Environmental  Laws

3.1    Air Pollution
    3.1.1 Classification of Air Pollutants
    3.1.2  Properties of Air Pollutants
    3.1.3  Health Effects
    3.1.4 Particulate Pollution Control Equipments
    3.1.5 Gaseous Pollution Control Equipments
    
3.2    Water Pollution
    3.2.1 Causes of Pollution
    3.2.2 Origin of Wastewater
    3.2.3 Waste Water Composition
    3.2.4 Types of Water Pollutants
    3.2.5 Basic Processes of Water Treatment
    
3.3    Land
    
3.4    Marine Pollution
    3.4.1 Sources and Effects of Marine Pollution Toxics
    3.4.2 Control Measures
    
3.5    Noise
    3.5.1 Effects of Noise
    3.5.2 Major Noise Sources
    3.5.3 Noise Control Measures
    
3.6    Thermal Pollution
    3.6.1 Effects of Thermal Pollution
    
3.7     Nuclear Hazards
    3.7.1 Nuclear Weapons
    3.7.2 Types of Nuclear Bursts
    3.7.3 Nuclear Injuries
    3.7.4 Residual Radiation
    
3.8    Nuclear Waste and their Treatment
    
3.9    Solid Waste Management
    3.9.1 Role of Human in Prevention of Pollution
    
3.10    Disaster Management
    3.10.1 Floods
    3.10.2 Earthquake
    3.10.3 Cyclone
    3.10.4 Landslides

2.1    Ecosystem
    2.1.1 Major Components of Ecosystems
    2.1.2 Energy and Matter Flow in Ecosystems
    2.1.3 Various Types of Ecosystems
    
2.2    Biodiversity
    2.2.1 Genetic Diversity
    2.2.2 Species Diversity
    2.2.3 Ecosystem Biodiversity
    2.2.4 Values of Biodiversity
    2.2.5 Threats of Biodiversity
    2.2.6 Endangered and Endemica Species of India
    2.2.7 Biodiversity Conservation

1.1     Forest Resources
    
1.2     Uses of Forest
    
1.3     Deforestation and its Effects
    
1.4     Water Resources
        
    1.4.1 Water Conflicts
    1.4.2 Dams Conflicts
    
1.5    Drought
    1.5.1 Regions of Drought in the World
    1.5.2 Effects of Drought
    
1.6     Flood
    
1.7    Environmental Effects of Mineral Resources
    
1.8    Food Rseources
    1.8.1 Technological Improvements in Food Production
    1.8.2 Environmental Issues Related to Increased Production
    
1.9    Overgrazing and its Effects
    
1.10    Impacts of Intensive Farming on Soil and Water Resources
    
1.11    Effects of Agricultural Chemicals on the Environment
    
1.12    Energy Sources
    
1.13    Waterlogging
    
1.14    Land Resources
    
1.15    Land Degradation
    
1.16    Soil Erosion
    1.16.1 Types of Erosion
    
1.17     Desertification
    1.17.1 Causes of Desertification
    1.17.2 Effects of Desertification
    
1.18    Conservation of Natural Resources
    1.18.1 Conflicts
    1.18.2 Challenges and Methods

ABSTRACT
It is impossible to envision a world without energy provisions and has become inevitable and an integral part of a nation’s prosperity. It has unparallel contributions towards the socioeconomic empowerment, industrial growth, and technological advancements, as also in mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Judicious utilisation of energy sources without infringing upon the sustainable energy demand is the need of the hour. Taking India’s huge bovine strength into account, biogas technology has the potential to transform the standard of living of rural millions. Effectively implementing the Govt. of India’s National Biogas and Organic Manure Programme (NBOMP) could save precocious demand on electricity, fertiliser and firewood while promoting self-sustainable organic farming. In this chapter, the cost and benefit analyses of biogas technology (involving biogas plants of different capacities) are discussed along with the long-term approach at the grassroots level to promote digested slurry for organic farming. The commercialisation and carbon crediting of biodigester technology is also narrated. It is necessary to chalk out a revenue model to commercialise slurry at the grassroots level to economically empower the beneficiaries, from family-type to industrial-scale biogas plants. Small-scale biofertiliser hubs at district level may be organised to collect dry slurry from the beneficiaries and process them further to make it market-ready through entities operating at the national level developing manure for agricultural practices, as also feeding materials for animal husbandry practices.

ABSTRACT
The ‘steel-drum type’ biogas plant installation programme in Punjab was initiated in the early seventies, whose construction works were entrusted on the Department of Agriculture. Because of their high cost and high failure rates then, only the affluent farmers could afford to install. In the meantime, a cheaper Chinese model, also known as Janta type (dome-type replacing the drum-type) plant, became popular but was still out of the reach of ordinary farmers. With dual objectives of cost reduction and efficient biogas production to make it affordable to small farmers, a coordinated research was initiated. Detailed extension surveys were carried out in Ludhiana district which inferred that the farmers did not install the gas-holding steel drum though they purchased it. A significantly low cost Katcha-Pucca plant model of 15m3/d capacity was developed and installed in Sangrur district. Similar digester was tried for Janta model in which the inlet, outlet and dome (gas holder) were masonry works but the digester was a Katcha pit, the dome of the plant being modified to a semi-circular dome. More than 80 such plants are functional in a single village, and more than 40–50% of the plants installed in Punjab and Haryana are these PAU designs. The chapter deals in greater details on the design aspects and the extensive field works carried out to achieve these successes, along with some relevant facts and figures. The write-up is written as a commentary, rather than a typical chapter, for the benefit and interest to the readers.

ABSTRACT
Nisargruna biogas technology has been developed in BARC for processing different types of biodegradable waste. This technology is based on biphasic separation of aerobic and anaerobic stages. Introduction of aerobic predigester has increased the efficiency of the process in terms of enhancing the quality and quantity of methane and also reducing the retention time of the process. Process parameters of the plant were studied and found that the modified design has proved very effective in faster digestion of complex waste. The technology has been commercialised and has spread across different parts of country for processing variety of wastes including kitchen waste, municipal waste, agriculture waste, textile waste and poultry waste. Microbial population from different stages of the plant was also studied and found their ability to convert waste to biogas, containing mainly methane.

Keywords: biogas, biphasic digestion, green energy, methane, microbial fermentation, Nisargruna, waste management

ABSTRACT
The global energy demand is increasing day by day. Now-a-days, the supply of global energy is highly dependent on fossil fuels (viz., crude oil, lignite, hard coal, natural gas). But, on one hand the source of fossil fuel is decreasing at a rapid rate, and on the other hand the burning of fossil fuel is also degrading the environment due to huge Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission (FAO/CMS, 2011). Hence, there is an urgent need of an alternate clean energy source that can sustain the future development undeterred while still protecting the environment. Biomass is considered as a sustainable source of clean energy that is useful in steam, fuel and chemicals production. It can be digested in controlled environment to produce biogas. The biogas is a clean, non-polluting and smoke-free fuel (Weiland, 2010) which can be used for applications that include cooking, space cooling/refrigeration, heating, electricity generation and gaseous fuel (CNG) for vehicles (Weiland, 2003). This paper analyses possible alternatives to process and utilise biogas for energy at industrial scale as a petroleum fuels replacement.

ABSTRACT
The rapid industrialisation and speedy progress towards urbanisation across the world have created the huge demand for energy moreover creating enormous quantity of wastes. The latter is in charge for polluting the environment in an exponential manner, resulting out of the harmful and poisonous compounds released by them. In recent years, there has been a pattern change from ‘waste-to-wealth’, considering the value of high organic fraction accessible in the wastes. The best-accomplished methods are that of anaerobic digestion; contribute to the production of methane (CH₄). Similar biotransformation has partial net energy harvests. Recently, fermentation industries steering their interest towards the production of value added products, viz., biohydrogen (H₂), biopolymers, ethanol, vitamins, acetic acid, enzymes, butanediols, etc. from carbon rich organic waste like cellulosic substrates have been envisioned to flourish in a multi-step process, such as the ‘Biorefinery’. A contemporary development in fermentation technology holds the key to overcome the constraints for such processes that may lead to a sustainable economy. One related technology is electrofermentation that has attracted significant attention recently owing to its capacity to boost the metabolic activities of microbes by means of extracellular electron transfer.

ABSTRACT
Biomethanation is the process of generating energy from anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic refuse. This helps reduce dependency on fossil fuels while reducing CO₂ emission. Organically-rich kitchen refuse (KR) generated daily from the households all over the world could be a good candidate to biogasify, though the quantity and quality of biogas depends on the KR proximate. To enhance biogasification, KR is subjected to physical, chemical and/or biological pretreatment. Physical pretreatments include chopping, grinding, ultrasonication and steam explosion, whereas chemical pretreatments could be by an alkali or a base. Biological treatment involves digestion of the organic matters by individual microbe or its consortium, although it takes place naturally. For biological treatment, standardising the substrate and inoculum ratio is essential. Candidate strains must be mutually compatible to formulate a microbial consortium. Bacillius seems to be a potential candidate as it is a facultative anaerobe exhibiting multiple essential enzyme activities (viz., amylase, cellulase and lipase). Maintaining an optimal pH of 7.0 and temperature of 37°C before and during anaerobic digestion is suggested. Other important factors in digestion include organic loading rate, retention time, C/N ratio, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration, etc. VFA content is vital as its accumulation during acidogenesis adversely affects the AD by dropping pH values to unfavourable levels. Acetogens convert VFA to acetate, CO₂ and H₂ in acetogenesis, finally converting it to CH4 in methanogenesis. For effective methanation,

ABSTRACT
The annual accumulating organic wastes generated through milling, brewing and various other agro-industrial and agri-processing activities in India amount to about 500 MMT. Most of these contain three major structural biopolymers, viz., cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, a large proportion of which is carbohydrate and phenolic in nature. Massive accumulations of this kind of recalcitrant biomass not only deteriorate the environment, but also generate huge amount of potentially useful materials. Biological transformation has globally become increasingly popular among researchers and academicians in treating agricultural, industrial, organic and toxic wastes these days. About 60% by weight of the original pineapple fruit in forms of peeled skin, core, crown end, etc. resulting from the pineapple processing remains unutilised being discharged as waste, causing disposal and pollution owes. Of the 10% dry matter content of such waste, about 96% is organic and 4% is inorganic. Being rich in cellulose and hemicellulose, it can be a valuable resource for numerous value-added products by bioconverting it to valuable products, including bioenergy. Biomethane is one such energy resource that can be produced by valorizing pineapple wastes by employing various bioconversion technologies. This chapter focuses on the bioconverstion technologies to produce biomethane from pineapple wastes.

ABSTRACT
There is a quantum global growth in both number and size of dairy industries in recent times. These industries discharge thousands of liters of wastewater characterised by a heavy chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), nutrients, inorganic salts, besides detergents and sanitisers each day (Kushwaha et al., 2011). High carbohydrates, fats and proteins contents in such waste streams originating from milk pose challenge to conventional municipal sewage treatment systems (Demirel et al., 2005). The easily biodegradable dairy effluent leads to precipitation of casein which is toxic and has a strong odour. Without adequate treatment, these effluents could pose serious threats to the receiving water bodies and disturb the ecosystem (Satpathy et al., 2017). For such heavily loaded organic effluents, biogasification through anaerobic digestion seems a promising strategy. This cost-effective energy generation process is also effective in environmental management compared to its other eco-friendly renewable source counterparts, such as, hydro, solar and wind (Satpathy, 2017). The Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors are the most popular anaerobic systems to treat the fluctuating organic loads in dairy effluents. Anaerobic filter (AF), Upflow Anaerobic Filter (UPAF), Fixed-bed anaerobic reactor, Anaerobic Hybrid Reactor (AHR) etc. are few other systems that are demonstrably competent removing COD upto 90% and generating biogas. Successful anaerobic systems reported yielded (with upto about 85% CH₄ content) 0.32-0.34m3 CH₄/kg COD removed. Biomethanation process and reactors designs are constantly being optimised for effective treatment of the effluents while maximising the biogas production. The energy-rich gas thus obtained could further be utilised for heat and electricity at the domestic level, and also as a vehicular fuel. Residual digestate can also be used as organic manures (Angelidaki et al., 2007).

ABSTRACT
Rice straw is one of the most abundant lignocellulosic agricultural wastes in India and can be used as a major resource for biogas production. The structure of rice straw is complex and is made up mainly of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. The lignin physically shields the cellulose and hemicelluloses, the main components which can be converted to energy, and hinders the access of microbial enzymes to these carbohydrate moieties. To overcome this making the straw a potential resource of biogas production, effective pretreatment is necessary that can efficiently hydrolyse the straw and make it accessible to cellulolytic enzymes and methanogens. Various pretreatment methods which are employed currently in the market are discussed here. For a process to be economically feasible it is necessary that the pretreatment be efficient as well as cost effective. To gain some insights into this aspect, the techno-commercial feasibility of Biomethanation of rice straw has been discussed.

ABSTRACT
Recent challenges for fossil fuels, associated environmental issues with disposal of organic garbage, and the rising costs for energy has encouraged researchers to search for alternate energy sources. Massive uncontrolled biogas from landfills, sludge and organic material degradation under anoxic conditions is an environmental management issue. Methane emission to atmosphere has a tremendous green house effect, but this can also be a valuable renewable energy resource. Biogas from kitchen wastes through anaerobic digestion by methanogens is such an alternate technology. Kitchen wastes are considered one of the best raw materials for biogasification. Biogas is mainly composed of 50-74% methane (CH₄), 25-28% carbon-di-oxide (CO₂), other volatile compounds including hydrogen sulphide (H₂S), water vapour and other trace gas compounds. The impurities in it, like Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) which is corrosive, downgrade its quality. Purified biogas of higher calorific value attracts attention as a substitute fuel for additional applications. Its purification using various suitable scalable and economically-viable scrubbing technologies to enhance its quality and performance as an alternate fuel is an important step in this direction. Thus, a technology to generate and purify biogas from kitchen waste has significant prospects in the energy sector, and also as a promising enterprise to employ the youth.

ABSTRACT
Increased environmental pollution and high demand over supply for conventional fossil fuel sources have led to the exploration of other renewable energy sources. Out of the potential alternatives, methane has come up with a promising unconventional fuel source. Several technologies have been developed to establish methanation, including biomethanation, chemical methanation and gas-to-liquid technology. Several factors like process parameters, catalysts and reactors have been studied for process optimisation and making methane production commercially viable. Although methane as a greenhouse gas is a contributor to global warming, its combustion produces relatively ‘environment friendly’ gas CO₂, and H₂O. The released CO₂ is fixed into biomass by plant through photosynthesis process. Only rarely does methane combustion produces CO when combusted in an oxygen-limited condition. Thus, methane production and combustion are carbon neutral process. This chapter focuses on the application of methane as a source of alternate energy. Various technologies used, recent advances and challenges faced in methanation process are discussed.

ABSTRACT
Biomethanation comprises of four interdependent stages in series, hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. Methanogenesis, the final stage of biomethanation, is accompanied with the reduction of substrates that include organic acids such as CH₃COOH, and others such as CO₂ and CH₃OH to CH₄ by methanogenic and methanotrophic archaea, usually under anaerobic conditions. Strictly anaerobic methanogenic archaea are found in the ruminant intestine, sewage digester, groundwater and deep soil/water etc. In methanogenesis, H₂ acts as the electron donor while substrates CO₂, CH₃OH and probably CoM-S-S-CoB (for CH₃COOH) act as terminal electron acceptors and reduce to methane, a process known as anaerobic respiration. This conversion is associated with the electrogenic proton motive force along with sodium motive force to drive the ATP synthesis by A0A1 ATP synthase, known as respiratory phosphorylation. The mechanism of conversion of methane from CO₂ by methanogens with cytochromes is same as those without cytochromes except that the reduction of heterodisulphide CoM-S-S-CoB is performed by the membrane-bound VhoACG-HdrDE complex for former while by cytoplasmic MvhADG–HdrABC complex for the later.

ABSTRACT
Methanogenesis is an important biogeochemical process takes place in anaerobic ecological sites. It is the last step of terminal electron accepting process of anaerobic respiration. Methanogens synthesise CH₄ using acetate and CO₂ as precursor molecules. Former types of methanogens are referred as acetoclastic methanogens and the later ones as hydrogenotrophic methanogens. After biogenesis of CH₄, it is emitted to atmosphere and causes global warming. In aerobic ecosystem CH₄ is oxidised by methanotrophs to CO₂ a less global warming molecule. However, in anoxic environment CH4 acts as an electron donor and interacts with various electron acceptors. Methane modulates denitrification, Fe reduction, SO₄ reduction and organic matter decomposition. Manuscript elucidates methanogenesis and highlights the pathways of interaction between methanogenesis and cycling of electron acceptors in various anaerobic ecosystems in relation to global C and N balance.

ABSTRACT
Methanogens are primarily anaerobic Archaebacteria representing the most primitive earthly creatures, alive since about 3.5 billion years. While oxygen inhibit their activity, they adapt well in a variety of ecological niche, viz., the intestinal tracts of insects and animals including ruminants, sewage digesters, groundwater and deep soil/water, etc. They are involved in biomethanation that converts organic polymers, including the complex recalcitrant lignocelluloses, to CH₄ and CO₂. Enhancing the process by optimising the physical, chemical and molecular parameters is an interesting biotechnology. Molecular research is rapidly progressing on the genomics, gene and its regulation, and methanogenesis as it expresses. Identifying novel species expressing methanogenesis and manipulating the genetic make-up including through cloning in recent years will set goals and leads for future investigations. The biomethanation enzyme Methyl-CoM-reductase (Mcr) constitutes about 10% of the methanogen protein. Due to its abundance and significance, elucidating its structure and its synthesis and regulation mechanism has received much attention recently. Mcr-coding genes from methanogens have been cloned and sequenced. An approach at the molecular level to enhance biomethanation seems to lie in metagenomics. The microbiology, biochemistry, the roles of the participating microbes, their molecular biology and applications in methanogenesis are discussed in this chapter.

ABSTRACT
Methanogenesis is a ubiquitous process primarily encountered in anaerobic environments. Methanogens are a group of diverse obligate anaerobic bacteria that produce methane from complex organic matter. Despite their differences in morphological characters and habitat, they show coherence in terms of methane-producing metabolic activity. Being distinctive from all other classical prokaryotes, these are grouped under another kingdom of Archea. Other distinctions of the members are based on their unique cell wall structures and membrane components, as well as differences in their highly conserved gene sequences. Methanogens likely owe their cosmopolitan status to their unique mode of energy metabolism of methane generation. They are active in various ecological niches, from rumens of animals to submarine volcanic vents, sewage digestors and landfills. Methanogenic bacteria are abundant in habitats where high affinity electron acceptors are negligible. Methane fermentation involves bacteria that obtain energy by catalysing anaerobically degradable organic matter to CH₄ and CO₂ by consuming H₂, CO₂, and low-carbon organic acids as their substrates. The gaseous products of methanogenesis are greenhouse gases, thus are major contributors to global warming. Methanogens could be used to produce renewable carbon-neutral energy substitute, biogas. Methane cycling archaea play a major role in global methane production as energy for the future.

• Definition of Bioinformatics
• History of Bioinformatics 
• Structural Bioinformatics
• New Branch of Bioinformatics 
• Bioinformatics - Application in Agriculture
• Analyzing Protein Sequence
• Pairwise Alignment
• Multiple Alignment
• Blast - A Sequence Alignment Tool
• EMBL
• SWISS–PROT
• Rice Genome Project
• Software for Bio-informatics
• Major Categories of Bioinformatics Software
• Internet Sites For Bioinformatics

• Web Portal
• Types of Portals

• Agriculture Database Concepts and Importance
• The Orientation of Topic Selection for the Construction of the Agricultural Database
• The Principle of Specialization in the Construction of the Agricultural Database
• Top Quality Principle of Building Databases
• Agriculture Database Types
• Agriculture Libraries
• Agriculture Journals
• Technical Reports
• Conference Papers
• E-Books in Agriculture

• Database
• Data Model
• Database Software
• DBMS Facility 
• Architecture for a DBMS
• Data Modeling
• Components of a Data Mode
• RDBMS (Relational Database Management System)
• Client/Server Model of Computing
• Entity Relationship Diagram (E-R diagram)
• Entity Relationship Diagram Notations - Front-end and Back-end
• Codd’s Rules
• SQL - Structured Query Language
• Data Definition Language (DDL)
• Data Manipulation Language (DML)
• DCL
• Data Control Language
• Transaction Control (TCL)

• A Brief Description of Visual Basic
• Types of Application in VB
• Creating the Project
• Steps in Building a Visual Basic Application
• Visual Basic Data Types
• Managing Variables 
• Constants
• String Functions
• Operators in Visual Basic 
• Controlling Program Flow
• Looping
• The InputBox( ) Function
• Methods
• Procedur
• Control Array
• Msgboxes
• Data Access
• Data Access Objects (DAO)
• Microsoft Jet Database Engine 
• Remote Data Objects
• Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects
• Data Control
• Object Linking and Embedding (OLE)

• Introduction
• Features of Genetic Algorithm 
• Steps in Executing the Genetic Algorithm
• Applications of Genetic Algorithm
• Artificial Ant Problem

• Introduction
• Types of DSS
• Scope of DSS
• Benefits of DSS 
• Common Uses of Decision Support Systems
• Decision Support System for Farm Management

• What is Meant by the Term Expert?
• Building Blocks of Expert Systems
• Designing Expert Systems in Problem Solving 
• Applications of Expert System
• An Expert System for Decision Problem
• Advantages of Expert System
• Cases of Expert Systems in Agriculture

• What is a Neural Network?
• How does an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) work?
• Characteristics of Neural Networks 
• Architectures of Artificial Neural Networks
• Learning Process
• Classification of Learning Algorithms
• Artificial Neural Networks in Agriculture -Intelligent Agent 
• Classes of Intelligent Agents
• Characteristic of Intelligent Agents

• What is Intelligence?
• What is Artificial Intelligence?
• Branches of AI
• Natural–Language
• Natural Language Processing 
• Natural Language Recognition
• Simple Natural Language Grammar
• Intelligent Technologies in Agriculture
• Intelligent Animal Houses
• Agricultural Robots

• Defining GIS
• Fundamentals of GIS
• Mapping Concepts, Features and Properties
• Geographical Data Sets
• Spatial & Non-spatial Data
• Attribute Data
• Remote Sensing in Agriculture
• Remote Sensing in Farm
• Principles of Remote Sensing
• How Does Remote Sensing Work?
• Global Positioning System
• Components of a GPS
• GPS Positioning Types
• GPS Applications
• Remote Sensing and GIS
• Use of GPS in Agriculture
• General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Network 
• The GPRS Network
• Benefits

• Introduction
• Characteristics of Management Information System
• Management Information Systems Advantage
• Outputs of a Management Information System

• Introduction
• The Concept of a Farm Management System

• Agriculture Information Systems
• Major Trends
• Agriculture Information System
• Importance
• Internet Based Agriculture Information System
• Support Provided by Agriculture Information System
• AGRIS/CARIS
• AGROVOC
• Agriculture Research Information System (ARIS)
• Agriculture Research Information Center

• What is Agroinformatics?
• Agroinformatics
• Definitions 
• Objectives of Agroinformatics
• Information Systems Terminology
• Agroinformatics Tools

Carbon is found in all living organisms and is the major building block for life on earth. It exists in many forms, predominantly as plant biomass, soil organic matter, and as the gas CO₂ in the atmosphere and dissolved in sea water. Carbon cycles globally among five distinct pools among which the largest oceanic poolis estimated at 38000 Pg (Pg= petagram =1x10¹⁵g=billion tonnes) and is increasingat the rate of 2.3 Pg C yr^-1 (Fig. 1). The geological C pool, comprising fossil fuels, is estimated at 4130 Pg, pedologic, estimated at 2500 Pg to 1m depth, atmospheric pool comprising 760 Pg of C with nearly all of it as CO₂, and the smallest among theglobal C pools is the biotic pool estimated at 560 Pg. The pedologic and biotic C pools together are called the terrestrial C pool estimated at approximately 2860 Pg.

Agricultural systems are complex, and understanding this complexity requires systematic research under shrinking agricultural research resources. Field experimentation can only be used to investigate a very limited number of variables under a few site-specific conditions. The crop growth simulation models simulate crop growth, development and yield taking into account the effects of weather, genetics, soil water, carbon and nitrogen, planting, irrigation and fertilizer (e.g. Nitrogen, Phosphorus) management. Ofthe many factors that potentially affect the growth of plants, the two that are most responsive to management are water and nitrogen. It is therefore not surprising that most crop models include routines to handle responses to water and nitrogen. Less frequently do models attempt to describe limitations due to other soil constraints (Probert and Keating, 2000). In the context of integrated nutrient management, the performance of a crop model depends mainly on its ability to adequately describe the release of nutrients from diverse inputs and their uptake by the crop.

Origins and genesis of a crop simulation model

Crop simulation model approach was started near about 50 years ago, in early 1960s when early simple crop models were developed for estimation of transpiration and photosynthesis. The first step towards crop modeling was the development of simple models to estimate light interception and photosynthesis (Loomis and williams, 1963; De wit, 1965 and Duncan et al., 1967). There are many crop growth simulation models. Some are more generic in nature while others are built for specific purposes. Most of these models simulate crop growth and soil processes using daily time steps. All models are developed with some assumptions and hypotheses, and all have strengths, weaknesses and limitations for appropriate application. Well-known crop modelling groups across the world include IBSNAT/IFDC (International Benchmark Sites Network for Agro technology Transfer/International Fertilizer Development Centre) in USA, WAU/AB-DLO (Wageningen Agriculture University/Centre for Agro-biological Research) in the Netherlands, and APSRU (Agriculture Production Systems Research Unit) in Australia. The IBSNAT project was initiated in 1982, and over the past 20 years it has developed more than 15 models, including CERES (Crop Estimation through Resource and Environment Synthesis) Rice and CERES Wheat, which are available either as stand-alone models or within the DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) shell (Uehara and Tsuji, 1993).

Introduction

Seed spices include group of annuals whose dried fruit or seeds are used as spices. These are characterised by pungency, strong odour, sweet or bitter taste. Coriander, cumin, fennel and fenugreek occupy largest area among the seed spices. However, ajowan, dil, celery, anise, nigella and caraway having secondary place as far as area and production is concerned. Major area under seed spices is in Rajasthan and Gujarat, and other seed spices producing states are Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. The seed spices account for about 36% and 17% of the total area and production of spices in country. The export of seed spices from India during 2008-09 was 4.71 thousand tonnes worth Rs. 54914.8 million rupees. The per cent export growth rate during 1995-96, 2000-01, 2005-06, 2007-08 and 2008-09 was 12.0, 11.0, 8.0, 36.0 and 19.0% in terms of value and 13.0, 3.0, 8, 13.0 and 6.0 in respect of quantity, respectively.

Integrated plant nutrient management includes use of organic manure/ compost, bio-fertilizer, chemical fertilizer, green manuring, residue management, legume based cropping system, use of nutrient-responsive varieties, proper method and time oforganic manure and fertilizer application, soil and water management to minimize the nutrient losses occurring through volatilization, denitrification, runoff and leaching. Application of plant nutrients in proper balance form is also a part of Integrated Plant Nutrient Management (IPNS) system. Supply of nutrients to seed spices in appropriate quantities and at the correct times is essential for economically and environmentally sustainable agriculture. Soil organic matter, crop residues and manures play a vital role in the supply of macro and micronutrients and the transformation between the various organic and inorganic forms often control availability, both for plant uptake and loss to the environment (Aishwath and Vashishtha, 2008; Lal, et al., 2009).

Cost is the value of the factors of production used in producing and distributing goods and services. The cost of a factor unit equals the maximum amount which the factor could earn in alternative employment. Broadly speaking, cost is the measure of what has to be given up in order to achieve something. Production costs play an important role in the decision of the farmers. Cost of production here means the exogenesis incurred per unit of output. In general, at given level of prices, a farmer can increase his farm income in two ways i.e. (i) by increasing production or (ii) by reducing the cost of production. The cost of production involves both cash cost and non cash cost items. Cash costs are incurred when resources are purchased and used immediately in the production process such as casual labour, fertilizer fuel etc. And non cash cost like depreciation on farm building and equipment and payment made to farmer himself or family labour, management and owned capital. Before estimating the cost of cultivation/production, we should know the concepts/terms are used in estimating the cost. Concept means idea underlying or general notion.

Cost concepts and items of cost

The cost of production of a crop is considered at three different levels viz., cost A, cost B and cost C. The concept of nine costs such as is followed by the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agricultures Government of india in their cost studies are given below.

Balanced crop nutrition is a most reaJized critical factor in allowing crops to give their full yield potential. The application of macro and micronutrients through manures and fertilizers to achieve this balance is an integral practice in modern crop production system. Macro and microelements have long been recognized as being associated with changes in the level of many diseases and yield and /or quality of crops. Three major elements N, P, and K are the most studied nutrients which chiefly affect relative resistance of crop plants to various diseases. Others macro/micro/beneficial nutrients including Ca, Mg, S, Mn,Te, Zn, Mo, Si, Bo and Cu have shown varying degrees of disease suppression/induction on many crop species under various environmental conditions. Crop nutrition influence plant health through: i. affecting the growth, reproduction, virulence, and survival of pathogens; ii. resistance and tolerance, predisposition and escape in the host crop; and iii. root exudates and microbial interactions facilitatingbiological control. Balanced crop nutrition can protect crops from pathogens by: i. avoiding plant stress, which may allow crops to better withstand the attack of pathogens and ii. manipulating nutrients to the advantage of crops and disadvantage of the pathogen. The modern intensive agriculture which mainly relies on chemical inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) and fertilizer responsive HYVs (high yielding varieties) has led the self sufficiency in food production in India and several other countries of the world. But, the indiscriminate and imbalance use of chemical fertilizers along with exhaustive cropping initiated several second generation problems including widespread micronutrient deficiencies and increased attack of several insect-pests and pathogenic diseases. The excessive use of nitrogen and no or reduced application of phosphorus, potash and other micronutrients is creating conducive conditions for several crop pathogens and their insect vectors. This situation frequently results in serious crop losses during favourable environmental conditions for disease development. The specific role of macro and micronutrients in maintaining crop health, effect of their dose and form of application on suppression /induction of various diseases and interaction with other soil/ environmental factor (s) will be discussed in following sections.

Organic C in agricultural soils contributes positively to soil fertility, soil tilth, crop production, and overall soil sustainability. Changes in agricultural management can potentially increase the accumulation rate of soil organic Cd (SOC), thereby sequesteringCO₂fromtheatmosphere.Optimizingagricultural management for accumulation of SOC can result in the sequestration of atmospheric CO₂, thereby partially mitigating the current increase in atmospheric Carbon dioxide. In addition to the environmental benefits of soil C sequestration, Carbon dioxide consideration has also been given to the implementation of a C credit trading system which may provide economic incentives for C sequestration initiatives.

Changes in agricultural practices for the purpose of increasing SOC must either increase organic matter inputs to the soil, decrease’decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM) and oxidation of SOC, or a combination thereof. These practices include, but are not limited to, reducing tillage intensity, decreasing or ceasing the fallow period, using a winter cover crop, changing from monoculture to rotation cropping, or altering soil inputs to increase primary production (e.g., fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation). Implementing practices that sequester C can reverse the loss of SOC that may have occurred under intensive cultivation thereby increasing SOC to a new equilibrium

A nutrient budget is a valuable indicator of the long term sustainability of a cropping system. It indicates where fertilizer application is inadequate and leading to decline in the soil nutrient status. Conversely, it can indicate excessive inputs which result in a nutrient surplus and greater potential for losses to the environment and waterways. (Combs et al., 1996) Thus nutrient budget is the comparison between all the sources of nutrients available to the producer and the requirement of nutrients to meet the crop and soil needs. The sources can either be from on the farm, such as livestock manure or credits from legumes, or from off the farm, such as purchased fertilizer or irrigation water. The requirement is the amount of nutrients needed by the crop to obtain the expected yields.

Most values for nutrients available from different sources (credits) and crop nutrient requirements are calculated from estimates taken from many years of long historical averages and field research. There is no “real time” method of calculating exactly what neither the crop’s nutrient requirement or the nutrients available are at any one time. More closely, both the nutrient requirements and availability are based on past performance for the climatic and soil condition. These values are given with some surety that the crop grown will be supplied with adequate nutrient during the growing season and the crops will not be limited in its growth. All incidental environment losses, such as runoff and leaching, have been accounted for. Climatic conditions, particularly temperature and soil moisture, greatly influence both the crop performance and the soil’ s capacity to provide nutrients to the plant. During any growing season, there can be many changes in the climate conditions that will affect both the crop growth and soil delivery of nutrients to the crop.

Although a nutrient budget is not an exact formula for supplying nutrients, it is one method for organizing the nutrient needs ofthe crop with the nutrients available on the farm. Nutrient budgets can easily determine if there is a gross imbalance between the nutrients that are available vs. the amount required. Nutrient budgets are one of the best methods to see the over all supply of crop nutrients available, compared to the estimated crop needs as given by historic records and field research. Continued use of soil testing, plant and water analyses and yield monitoring are essential to maintain good nutrient balance with desired results.

Biodiversity is the variety of life in different microbes, animals, plants and their genes present in the ecosystem. Soil provides a vital habitat and environment primarily for microflora such as bactria, actinomycetes, fungi as well as microfauna viz. protozoa and nematodes, mesofauna such as microarthopods, enchytraeids, macrofauna such as earthworms, beetles, termites and millipedes (Gaur 2006a).

Biodiversity and soil are interlinked which interact closely with wider biosphere. Conversely, biological activity is ofprime importance in influencing the physical and chemical conditions of soil (Bardgett 2005). The level of soil biological activity is, therefore, affected by soil type and also depends on the use of management practices which contribute to crop productivity.

Soil biodiversity and soil processes

A majority of soil organisms participate in various processes which are essential for the biosphere. The main ecological function is to decompose organic matter largely derived from the plant and animals residues Which consist of celluloses, hemicelluloses and lignin, and to supply plant nutrients to support growth. These organisms participate in various nutrient cycles and processes such as nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, nitrogen fixation, transformations ofphosphorus, potassium, sulphur, calcium, magnesium, iron and micronutrients (Pankhurst et al 1997). They participate in bioremediation of harmful compounds such as heavy metals and pesticide residues (Gaur 2006 b). They not only maintain physical and chemical conditions of soil, but also regulate emissions / assimilations of green house gases and suppress soil borne diseases and pests

Rice-wheat cropping system is the most important food production system in India. This system has enabled the country to attain food security during last three decades and provided livelihood to millions of farming families in recent times. The productivity of this system has now started showing signs of decline or stagnation at many places. There are also concerns of declining soil health and other related environmental problems. At the same time, food demand is rapidly increasing due to increasing population and income growth. During the past 30 years, agricultural production has been able to keep pace with population demand for food. This came about through significant area and yield growth. Area growth was a result of new lands being farmed and through increases in cropping intensity, from a single crop to double or even triple crops per calendar year. Area growth will be less important in its contribution to production growth in the future as more land is used for urban areas and industry. Yield growth will have to be the mainstay for providing the means for meeting future food demands unless food imports start to play a major role. Total factor productivity is declining and farmers have to apply more fertilizer to obtain the same yields. There is, therefore, a huge challenge ahead to meet future food demands without damaging the natural resource base on which agriculture depends, producing food at a cost that is affordable by the poor, and with incentives to farmers that allow them to improve their livelihoods. Water will become a major limiting factor for sustained production in the next decade. Rapidly growing urban areas and industry will compete with agriculture for good quality water. There are already reports of declining water tables in some areas leading to more costly pumping of groundwater and increased costs of production.

This chapter describes various conservation agriculture technologies to attain the goal of increasing productivity and meeting food security needs while at the same time efficiently using natural resources, including water, providing environmental benefits and improving the rural livelihoods of farmers. The major success in the last few years has been the development and deployment of conservation agriculture technologies (CATs) with farmers in the rice-wheat systems. CATs range from simple surface seeding, where wheat seed is broadcast on the non-ploughed soil; no-till with a special opener for placing seed in the soil also without ploughing; reduced tillage and bed planting. This has benefited farmers through less cost, more yields and more income. CATs are defined as any practice that will result in improvement of the efficiency of natural resources. These technologies are rapidly gaining popularity among farmers as they result in higher production at less cost with significant benefits to the environment and more efficient use of natural resources. This ultimately results in higher profits, cheaper food, and improved farmer livelihoods. Crop diversification is also easier as less land is needed to produce staple cereals, freeing up land for other crops.

Agriculture in India is one of the most important sectors of its economy. It provides livelihood to almost two thirds of the work force in the country and accounts for 18% of India’s GDP. About 43 % of India’s geographical area is used for agricultural activity and large number of production systems are in practice in different parts ofthe country. In pre-independence era (before the 1950s), agriculture in India was a system of harnessing nature for the sustenance of human beings, similar to the presently defined organic farming. Some countries have moved away from inorganic to organic farming yet it is not possible for India to depend entirely upon this system of farming due to large population. Total availability of plant nutrients from organic sources is projected to be 7.75 million tonnes by 2025 (Tandon, 1997) against the total requirement of37.50 million tonnes (Katyal, 2001) for 1504 million population (Sekhon, 1997). Thus nutrients supply through organic sources alone would result in deficiency of about 30 million tonnes of nutrients. Hence, it is imperative to use both organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients enhance food production for the increasing population (Mahajan et al., 2007). In India the contribution of organic sources was 80-100 per cent in 1949-50 and reduced to about 32 per cent in 1993-94 and 20-25 per cent in 2004-05. So, it is imperative to enhance organic sources to meet total nutrient consumption. Following independence, rapid population growth in India placed great pressure on land and on these traditional farming systems; huge demands for food grains led to increased use of fertilizers and pesticides to boost production. Still a negative balance of about 8 million tones of NPK is foreseen in 2020, even if we continue to use chemical fertilizers, maintaining present growth rates of production and consumption. The most optimistic estimates at present, show that only about 25-30 per cent nutrient needs of Indian agriculture can be met by utilizing various organic sources. Many of the gains in production during the last 4-5 decades resulted from the “Green Revolution,” a campaign of technological interventions in agriculture widely adopted by farmers in developing countries. Expansion of irrigation to cover rain fed areas, popularization of hybrids/ transgenic varieties of crops, and use ofsynthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides were the maj or technologies promoted. This paid rich dividends in India, quadrupling food grain production from 50 million metric tons in 1950-51 to 211 million metric tons in 2001-02, and enabling India to become self-sufficient in food grain. Now a second green revolution is also in the offing, to boost agricultural production and meet the estimated requirement of 337 million metric tons.

Indian horticulture has shown impressive impact on production, productivity and profitability. Currently, the total production of horticultural produce is 214.7 million tones from the 9% of total cultivated area in India, which contribute 30.4% to GDP of agriculture (Singh, 2010). In world perspective, India is second largest producer of fruits (68.5 mt) from 6.10 m ha area and contributes 11.2% in global fruit production. Vegetable crops occupying 8.0 m ha have the production of 129.1 mt (Table 1). However; India is the largest producer, consumer and exporter of spices and spice products in the world and produce more than 50 spices. The spice production in India is the order of 4.14 mt from an area of about 2.63 m ha. India is also the leading producer of plantation crops in the world and contributes 22.34% in coconut, 25% in cashewnut and 55% in arcanut. Commercial floriculture sector has recorded fast pace of growth during the last decade. During the last decade area under floriculture has expended to 1,67,000 ha with production of 9,87,000 MT of loose flower and 4.8 million cut flowers (Singh, 2010). The over all percent share of fruits and vegetables to their total production and contribution of different states for production of fruits and vegetables are repicted in Fig. 1 & 2. From the above fact, it is indicated that the production of horticulture produce has increased manifold but the gap in demand and supply continues simultaneously and is hardly sufficient and meets only 46% of national demand. Hence, there is a strong need to increase the production and productivity through crop diversification.

Protected cultivation of horticultural crops offers the best choice for diversification from traditional agriculture production system for a number of reasons. Production of crops under protected structures has great potential in augmenting production and quality of vegetables, flowers and in some fruit crops in main and off-season and maximizing water and nutrient use efficiency under varied agro-climatic conditions of the country. This becomes relevant to growers in India who have small land holding. They would be interested in a technology, which helps them to produce more crops each year from their land, particularly during off-season when prices are higher. The commonly protected structures are polyhouses, poly-tunnels, floating row covers, clotches, shade-net, insect-proof net and plastic-mulches (Chandra et al., 2000 ; Singh et al. 2010). These protected structures act as physical barrier and play a key role in integrated pest management by preventing spread of insect-pests and viruses which causes severe damage to the crop (Singh et al., 2003). This technology has great potential especially in periurban agriculture in near future, since it can be profitably used for growing high value vegetable crops like tomato, cheery-tomato, coloured peppers, parthenocarpic cucumbers, cut-flowers like rose, carnation, Berbera, lilium and fruits like strawberry, grapes etc. and for off-season cultivation of vegetables and their healthy and virus-free seedling production.

Protected cultivation is intended to mean some level of control over plant micro-climate to alleviate one or more of abiotic stresses for optimum plant growth. The microclimatic parameters being referred here are temperature, light, air-composition and the nature of rooting medium.

India is a leading vegetable producing country in the world. Presently it occupies 7.981 million hectare area with the annual production 129.077million tones (2008-09). The country being belessed with the unique gift of nature of diverse climate and distinct seasons, make it possible to grow an array of vegetables number exceeding more than hundred types. However, potato being the staple food and easy to mix in several preparations ranks first (26.6%) in total production of vetetables followed by onion (10.5%) and other important Solanaceous vegetables like tomato (8.6%), brinjal (8.0%). Cauliflower and cabbage are most preferred winter vegetables and their total share in the country’s vegetable production is 5.1 and 5.3%, respectively. Other important vegetables, which are primarily grown in the country, are okra, onion, vegetable peas and a good range of cucurbits (Fig. 1)

There is miss-match in area production and productivity of vegetables among various states of the country. The West Bengal ranks first in the total production of vegetables in the country and its production during the year 2008-09 was in tune of more than 22.704 million tones, contributing the more than one-fifth of total country’s vegetable product ion. Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Orissa in north India and Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Karanataka in south India are the other leading vegetable producing states in the country. In last one decade, there has been considerable progress in enchancing the productivity of vegetables which is presently 16.2 tonnes hectare^-1. Incessant growth of urbanization, ceaseless fragmentation ofland holdings and depleting natural resources are the major challenges before the expansion of any agricultural commodity either cereals or vegetables. Hence, our attention must be focused on vertical expansion strengthened with the boon ofthe technology instead of horizontal expansion just by increasing the crop area. To ensure the nutrition security of the burgeoning population of the country, it is estimated that up to 2020, the country’s vegetable demand would be around 155 million tones (Rai et al., 2004; Pandey et al., 2009). To achieve this target, it is sine qua non to integrate the various technologies right from production to post-harvest.

The apparent reasons for undesirable productivity under intensively cultivated areas are depletion of native nutrient reserves, emergence of multinutrient deficiencies, and consequent decline in factor productivity of applied nutrient (Dwivedi et al., 2006; Yadav, 1998; Yadav, 2003). Surveys conducted at PDFSR in different agro-climatic regions of Indo- Gangetic Plain indicated that in order to achieve previously attained yield levels, farmers have started applying greater doses of N than the recommended ones (Dwivedi et al., 2001; Sharma, 2003). Such indiscriminate use of N is likely to further worsen the nutrient imbalance in soil-plant systems, besides increasing the pest incidence, cost of production and environmental problems (Dwivedi et al., 2001). The annual productivity of rice - wheat could hardly exceed 9 t ha^-1 in the multilocation experiments on yield maximization (Dwivedi and Singh, 2011). On the other hand, long-term experiments (Singh and Mishra, 2010) and other studies indicate that crop productivity can be sustained with balanced fertilization, taking into account the emerging deficiencies of secondary and micronutrients (Tiwari et al., 2006)

Nutrient management is a major component of a soil and crop management system. It becomes even more important in intensive high yielding cropping systems because of the higher investments at stake. The SSNM is applying those concepts to areas within a field that are known to require different management options from the field average. Site specific nutrient management is a concept that can be applied to any field and any crop. Yet, it is most often thought of in relation to use of computer and satellite equipment, and does not require large farming operation. The technology tools certainly expand the capabilities for using site-specific management. This is really a “repackaging“ of management concepts that have been developed and promoted for many years.