eChapters

Role of Biotechnological Approaches

In our fore-going chapters, we have studied variety of plant products such as alkaloids, glycosides, volatile or essential oils, gums and mucilage and oleoresins with varied role to play to the plants as well as to human.Knowledge of plants and knowledge of healing have been closely linked. It is well established that industries have many direct and indirect effects on human population. Increased stress is most evident at the same time health awareness goes parallel in the recent times. Most of the natural plant products are compounds biosynthetically derived from primary metabolites such as amino acids, carbohydrate metabolic intermediates and fatty acids. These secondary metabolites are the major sources of pharmaceuticals, food additives, fragrance and pesticides.

Application of biotechnology know how helps to synthesize the novel molecules and also could be beneficial to enhance the production of secondary metabolites. Classical definition of biotechnology states that it is “The use of living organisms or their products to enhance our lives and our environment.” The word Pharming is commonly use to describe genetically engineered plants or livestock to produce medically useful products –predominantly protein drugs. Plants or animals are genetically engineered to contain genes capable of producing a biologic or drug compound. Therapeutic proteins are designed to treat illness includes serum proteins, cytokines, growth regulators, anti coagulants, antbiotics, lysosomal enzymes and plant secondary metabolites.

Abstract

Biotechnology offers an opportunity to exploit the cell, tissue, organ or entire organism by growing them in vitro and to genetically manipulate them to obtain desired compounds. It plays a pivotal role in search for alternatives to production of desirable biomedical compounds. There are several approaches have been used to increase the yield of metabolites from cell cultures such as manipulation of nutrient medium, application of exogenous growth stimulators, chemical treatment, precursor feeding, elicitation, transformed cultures, metabolic engineering, micropropagation, bioreactor cultures and etc.

Summary

Idealistic theories of property are projected to offer general and explicit statements of the justification for deciding legal and moral questions about the status property claims. Debates over property rights in biotechnology were occasioned by specific legislative proposals such as the US Animal Patent Act of 1986, and by filing of patent applications for DNA sequences and processes in the early 1990s. While these debates make sporadic petition to philosophical theories of property, moral claims were entwined with questions about filing requirements, tests for worth, and the rules for licensing and defending patents. The comparative scarcity of discussion on intellectual property at that time dictated the general approach of the chapter: Review basic philosophical approaches to property rights, and speculate on how one might use these approaches in constructing an argument pertinent to agricultural biotechnology. This chapter deals with different approaches to intellectual property in the field of Plant Sciences especially the Biotechnology. It incorporate many different types of intellectual property and a variety of incommensurable values play a role in the justification of intellectual property.

3.1 Biowarfare

Biowarfare, also known as Biological warfare or germ warfare, is the use of biological toxins or infectious agents such as bacteria, viruses, insects, and fungi with the intent to kill, harm or incapacitate humans, animals or plants as an act of war. Biological weapons (often termed “bio-weapons”, “biological threat agents”, or “bio-agents”) are living organisms or replicating entities (like viruses, which are not universally considered “alive”). Entomological (insect) warfare is a subtype of biological warfare.

Offensive biological warfare is prohibited under customary international humanitarian law and several international treaties. 

Bird of Paradise, belonging to the genus Strelitzia, is a distinctive ornamental cut flower recognized for its striking inflorescences and architectural form. This chapter covers its origin, botanical features, species, varieties and commercial importance. It explains environmental requirements, soil conditions, propagation, planting, irrigation, nutrient management and cultural operations. The chapter also addresses pests, diseases, harvesting, grading and postharvest handling. Because of its unique appearance and suitability for floral arrangements, Bird of Paradise has significant potential in premium floriculture markets. The chapter provides practical production guidance for growers seeking to develop high-value tropical cut flower enterprises. commercially and sustainably.

Black gram (Vigna mungo, L. Hepper, 2 n = 2 x = 22, family Leguminosae/ Fabaceae, essentially self-pollinated) has a global production of 3.2 million tons where India is the largest producer accounting for more than 70% of the global production followed by Myanmar and Thailand. Indian black gram area, production and productivity in 2010-11 were 3.25 million ha, 1.76 million tons and 522 kg/ha. The corresponding figures for 2015-16 were 3.62 million ha, 1.95 million tons and 537 kg/ha and the corresponding figures for 2016- 17 were 4.48 million ha, 2.83 million tons and 632 kg/ha. For 2017-18 (IV advance estimate), the figures were 5.44 million ha, 3.56 million tons and 655 kg/ha (Directorate of Pulses Development, 2018). These figures show a steady rise in black gram area, production and productivity over the years. This is the third important pulse crop in India after gram and pigeonpea. The three states namely, Madhya Pradesh, UP and Andhra Pradesh alone account for about 50% of the black gram area and production in India.

Blotting is the procedure through which nucleic acids or proteins are immobilized onto a solid support generally nylon or nitrocellulose membranes. Blotting of nucleic acid is the central technique for labeling and hybridization on membranes have formed the basis for a range of experimental techniques involving understanding of gene expression, organization, etc. More recently the identification of abnormal genes in genomic DNA has become increasingly important in clinical research and genetic counseling. We can identify inherited disease, infectious agent present in the sample by using blotting technique. It is also used to mapping restriction sites in single copy gene.

Southern Blotting
Introduction

Southern hybridization was named after Edward M. Southern who developed this procedure at Edinburgh University in the 1970s. To oversimplify, DNA molecules are transferred from an agarose gel onto a membrane. Southern blotting is designed to locate a particular sequence of DNA within a complex mixture. It is also called Southern blotting since the procedure for transfer of DNA from the gel to the nitrocellulose filter resembles blotting. In Southern hybridization, a sample of DNA containing fragments of different sizes is subjected to electrophoresis using either polyacrylamide or agarose gel.

In previous Chapter, a list was furnished mentioning common names, botanical names, family and types of the all plants mentioned in the Ramayana. The purpose was to know the total number of plants and trees mentioned besides providing reference of the Shlokas as well. This information led to identification of the plants and trees but details about their morphological and floral characters were not mentioned. Therefore, in this Chapter details of the trees and other plants have been provided. This will help to know all about their botanical standing, conservation status, nativity, morphological and floral characters so that one can know the full details including present-day status, availability and importance (Cowen, 1950; Randhawa, 1983; Roy, 2015; 2024).

1. Botanical Name: Adenanthera pavonina L.

Synonym: Adenanthera gersenii Scheff.

Common Name: ‘Red Bead Tree’, ‘Curly Bean’, ‘Red Sandal Wood’

Family: Fabaceae

Nativity: India, Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia to Queensland

Conservation Status: Common (Not Threatened)

Type: Tree

Morphological and Floral Characters: Red Bead Tree is a timber tree found wild in India. Leaves compound, bipinnate, green when young, turning yellow on maturity. Flowers small, yellowish, grows in a dense, drooping almost cat tail like flower-heads. Fruits curved pods, hanging, green that turn brown, coil up and split open on ripening, showing small bright red seeds which are attractive, used as beads in jewellery.

Maize is a tall, determinate annual C₄ plant varying in height from (1-4) meters producing large, narrow, opposing leaves (about a tenth as wide as they are long), borne alternately along the length of a solid stem. The botanical features of various plant parts are as follows: 

Root

Root system of maize consists of seminal roots, crown or coronal or adventitious or fibrous roots and brace, pop or aerial roots. Seminal roots - which develop from radical and persist for long period. Crown roots developing from the lower nodes of stem below ground level which are the effective and active roots of plant and.  Brace or prop roots, produced by lower two nodes. The roots grow very rapidly and almost equally outwards and downwards. Favorable soils may allow corn root growth up to 60 cm laterally and in depth.

1. Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Wheat has been traditionally grouped into the genera Triticum in the tribe Tritiaceae of the family Poaceae. Bread wheat, 2n=6x=42 is a hexaploid consisting of three distinct genomic complementary, namely, A, B and D, with the genome structure AABBDD. In the past there were 4 species, viz. Triticum aestivum, T. durum, T. dicoccum and T. sphaerococcum, under cultivation in India. T. sphaerococcum has now practically gone out of cultivation because of its low productivity and high susceptibility to diseases. The major wheat producing countries are China, India, USA, the Russian Federation, and Australia. These five countries together contribute more than half of the global wheat production. In India, Uttar Pradesh has registered the highest production followed by Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan and Bihar. These top six states together contributed around 90 per cent of the total wheat production in the country

Floral Biology

The inflorescence of wheat is known as spikelets. Spikelets are alternately arranged on the rachis; each spikelet’s has a small joint axis which bear two to nine flower known as florets. Close to the base of rachilla are two empty boat shaped bracts known as glumes. Above these inserted alternately on opposite side of the rachilla known as lemma. Opposite it’s a thin membrane bracts known as palea enclosed within the lemma and palea are a single pistil and three steamens. The pistil consists of an ovary bearing two short styles each carrying a feathery stigma. At the base of the ovary are two membranous scales known as lodicules. Each stamen consists of a thread like filament carrying a pollen containing anther.

1) Origin and distribution

Pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L) Leeke, 2n-14) originated in west Africa from where it was introduced into India. Large variability is still found in Africa. Pearl millet is a dual purpose crop; its grain is used for human consumption and its fodder as cattle feed. It is cultivated mainly in Africa and Asia, primarily as a grain crop in an area of 26 million ha with a production of 13 million tonnes. As a poor man’s bread, it sustains a large population of Africa and Asia. It also contributes to the economy of countries like the U.S.A. where it is grown as a forage crop.

In India, Pennisetum americanum (bajra) is cultivated on 11 to 12 million ha land with a production of about 6 million tonnes. It is grown on marginal lands and in areas of scanty rainfall. Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana account for about 90 per cent of the total area under this crop.

Introduction

Man’s intervention in the evolution of plants, to adapt them to suit his needs, constitutes the practice of plant breeding. Historically regarded as an art and still too empirical to be accepted universally as a science, it has recently been described as a technology (Riley 1978). Whether art, science or technology, it certainly draws on a wide range of disciplines and embodies all those principles of organisation and management that determine success in any production-oriented programme.

Perhaps the biggest contribution that the plant breeder has made to increased production during the past 50 years has been in helping to alleviate the effects of natural hazards such as lodging, pests and diseases on crop production. While most of this progress has been through the manipulation of biotic stresses, much is still to be achieved under non-biotic stresses such as drought, salinity, temperature, etc. This argument is strengthened by the fact that in spite of the spectacular achievements made possible by the ‘Green Revolution’, the productivity level of most crop plants, including wheat and rice, has remained both low and static under stress conditions. Concerted efforts are needed through an approach of interdisciplinary research, since not much has been done to define criteria for stress assessment and evolving breeding approaches for incorporating stress tolerance in crop plants.

Transgenic crops, developed through genetic engineering techniques, have revolutionized modern agriculture by conferring novel traits that enhance yield, quality, and resilience. This chapter delves into the intricate interplay between the scientific advancements in breeding approaches for transgenic crops and the critical ethical concerns and regulatory frameworks that accompany them. The chapter begins by introducing the concept of transgenic crops and provides an overview of the diverse breeding techniques employed to manipulate plant genomes. These techniques include Agrobacterium mediated transformation, biolistic transformation, CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats–associated protein 9) genome editing, RNA interference (RNAi), and site-specific integration methods. Each method is presented within the context of its potential benefits and limitations. The subsequent sections address the ethical considerations that arise from the creation and deployment of transgenic crops. The potential ecological and biodiversity impacts, cross-contamination risks with conventional crops, and issues related to patenting genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are explored. Furthermore, the chapter examines the ethical implications of genetically modified crops on human and animal health and questions surrounding the monopolization of seed resources. Looking to the future, the chapter outlines emerging breeding technologies and anticipates potential challenges in ethical consideration and regulation.

Introduction
Based on the mode of reproduction, plants are broadly classified into sexually propagated and asexually propagated crops and some of the agricultural crops and a large number of horticultural crops are asexually propagated. The most important asexually propagated crops cultivated on a global basis are potato (Solanum tuberosum), cassava (Manihot esculenta), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), sugarcane (Saccharum spp), yam (Dioscorea spp.), taro (Colocasia esculenta), banana (Musa paradisiaca), etc. In sexually propagated crops, seeds are the primary propagules and it is produced by the fertilization of male and female gametes. Whereas, asexual reproduction or clonal reproduction covers all those modes of multiplication of plants where normal gamete formation and fertilization do not take place and vegetative propagules are the means of reproduction. Since sexual reproduction involves meiosis, segregation and recombination, the creation of variation is a continuous process which is inevitable in these crops. On the other hand, in asexual propagation, progenies are identical to the parent clones and they are genetically similar without any variation and they reproduce via mitosis.
Characteristics of asexually propagated crops
• Majority of the asexually propagated crops are perennials, e.g., sugarcane, fruit trees, etc. The annual crops are mostly tuber crops, e.g., potato, cassava, sweet potato, etc.
• Many of these crops show reduced flowering and seed set, and some varieties of these crops do not flower at all. But many of these crops flower regularly and show satisfactory seed set.
• They are invariably cross-pollinated and highly heterozygous and show severe inbreeding depression.
• A vast majority of asexually propagated crops are either polyploids. eg., sugarcane, potato, sweet potato, etc., or have polyploid species or varieties.
• Many cultivated crops are interspecific hybrids, ex., banana, sugarcane, etc.
• These crops consist of a large number of clones, that is, progeny derived from a single plant through asexual reproduction. Thus, each variety of an asexually propagated crop is a clone.

Expression of genetic potential for growth and yield of a crop variety is directly dependent upon the environment comprising both climate (weather) and soil components. As discussed in the preceding chapter, the term ‘salt-affected soils’ encompasses a broad group of adverse but distinct soil conditions, namely, saline, alkali (sodic) and acid soils with further variations such as coastal and inland locations as well as arid and water-logged situations (Swaminathan 1977; Bresler et al. 1982). Factors limiting growth and yield of crop plants in various categories of problem soils are different and specific. Likewise, adaptive strategies evolved by plants to cope with the prevailing edaphic stresses, such as salt stress, also vary a great deal as indicated in Table 1. It is not unexpected therefore, that even varieties within a crop often show notable differences regarding tolerance to adverse soil conditions (Epstein et al. 1980; Devine 1982; Shannon 1984; Sayed 1985). Hence, it is essential that the breeder must understand the inherent charaderistics of the problem soil with which he is concerned and should also simultaneously appreciate that basically it is the sensitivity of crop variety, rather than the soil parameters per se, that essentially determines the occurrence as well as the magnitude of actual soil problem (Rana 1977). Since the degree of tolerance (adaptation) of crop varieties to different kinds of salt affected soils is genetically controlled, it is axiomatic that it can be improved through genetic manipulations by adopting suitable breeding procedures.

This chapter starts quoting first para of the book entitled Disease Resistance in Plants by Van Der Plank (1968). “In 1958 the American Phytopathological Society met to celebrate its Golden Jubilee and review the problems and progress in plant pathology during the 50 years, 1908 to 1958. J. C. Walker was elected to review the problems and progress in controlling plant diseases by host resistance, a fitting tribute to one who perhaps more than any other had contributed during those 50 years both to understanding of nature of resistance and to the practical application of resistance to problems in horticulture and agriculture. In his summary Walker wrote “By and large the development of resistant varieties must be looked upon as a continuing program. The potential variability of most pathogens (including viruses) will not permit any currently successful variety to remain so for an indefinite period”. This opening para tells the importance of breeding for resistance to diseases in crop plants on a continuous basis as the fight between host and the pathogen will go on and on.

Plant diseases, in spite of the various measures adopted to control them, continue to be a major cause of crop losses. At times these losses have been so heavy that they have caused severe famines. Diseases are caused by a wide variety of organisms such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, mycoplasma and nematodes. The diseases may be partially or completely controlled by chemical, cultural and genetic methods. When no single method is effective in controlling a disease, integrated control constituting a combination of the three methods of disease control (chemical, cultural, genetic) may be effective. If host resistance alone is sufficient to check a disease, then it is to be preferred to other methods because it is the least expensive, has no adverse environmental effects and involves no specific action on the part of the farmer, even when only partial, genetic resistance supplements chemical control and makes it more effective in comparison with chemical control on a completely susceptible cultivar.

Many plant diseases have been successfully controlled by exploiting genetic resistance especially where differentiation in the pathogen with respect to resistance genes in the host is lacking. In some cases, even when pathotype differentiation occurs in the pathogen, genetic resistance in combination with other methods has given adequate control. Breeding for resistance to highly variable air-borne fungal pathogens has claimed much time and effort of plant breeders and success has often been transient. The reasons for the shortlived success have become clear from research during the last quarter of a century.

The immediate and long-term objective of modern plant breeding in all countries irrespective of the state of their advancement is increasing the availability of food to meet the calorie-protein requirement of their people. In the past, breeders have concentrated their efforts on increasing the yield of the important crop species. Better adaptation to local environmental conditions, high production and better resistance to the major pests and diseases have been among the priority goals of genetic plant improvement. Yielding ability and stability undoubtedly deserve high priority but enough attention also needs to be paid to improving nutritional characteristics of the plant produce for their maximum utilisation. Awareness of nutritional requirements and the optimal characteristics of crop products to be utilised as food and feed, therefore, becomes an important parameter of breeding effort.

The main source of food in the developing world is cereals which provides 45 to 85 per cent of the total calories and 50 to 80 per cent of the total protein requirements. The consumption of animal proteins, which are nutritionally well balanced, is low and costly and beyond the reach of the low income groups. On the other hand, plant proteins are cheaper to produce and easier to store and transport. All these factors go in favour of increasing the quantity and quality of cereal proteins in order to improve the dietary and nutritional status of the masses in the developing world.

Proteins are made up of about twenty different amino acids. For man, eight of these amino acids, valine, methionine, leucine, isoleucine, threonine, phenylalanine, lysine and tryptophan, are essential (EAA) for constituting a well balanced diet. In impioving the grain quality of cereals consideration should, therefore, be given apart from the content of carbohydrates, fats, minerals and vitamins in the grains, to improving the protein content as also the amino acid composition of the protein.

I. Introduction
Abiotic stress refers to the detrimental impact of environmental factors such as temperature, light intensity, humidity, and salinity on plants, leading to damage or hindered growth. Unlike biotic stresses caused by living organisms, these abiotic stresses arise from physical conditions like extreme temperatures, droughts, floods, high winds, air pollution, soil erosion, and other natural phenomena. The severity of these stressors varies depending on the plant species and their ability to adapt to changing surroundings. Gaining insights into how plants react to abiotic stress is essential for devising strategies to enhance crop productivity in unfavorable conditions (Huang et al., 2014; Zhu, 2016).
A. Definition and types of abiotic stress
Abiotic stress pertains to the adverse effects of non-living elements on organisms within a particular habitat. These stressors surpass the usual scope of environmental fluctuations and have the potential to damage both plants and animals. In contrast to biotic stress triggered by living disturbances, abiotic stress factors are intangible and encompass factors such as intense sunlight, extreme temperatures, wind, and various other natural phenomena.