eChapters

10.1 Purpose

To lay down a standard protocol to perform qPCR for quantitative analysis of target genomic sequence.

10.2 Principle

qPCR or quantitative polymerase chain reaction or real-time polymerase chain reaction, is a molecular biology technique to amplify and at a time quantify a targeted DNA molecule and based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). It is called real time as the amplified DNA is detected as the reaction progresses and holds an advantage over standard PCR where the reaction is detected at its end. There are two common methods in quantitative PCR to detect the products i) non-specific fluorescent dyes which intercalates with any double stranded DNA ii) sequence-specific DNA probes labeled with a fluorescent reporter consisting oligonucleotides. This reporters helps in detection of the complementary hybridization of the probe and quantifies amount of DNA in cells or tissues.

11.1 Principle

In situ hybridization techniques involve detection of specific nucleic acid sequences to in morphologically preserved chromosomes, cells or tissue sections. Along with immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization can correlate microscopic topological information to gene activity at the level of DNA, mRNA or protein. The FISH protocol involves 1) denaturation and hybridisation performed on Day 1 and 2) washing and detection performed on Day 2. DNA of the chromosomes and the probes are denatured and allowed to hybridize overnight on the first day. On day 2, slides are washed to remove unbound DNA sequences followed by detection, counterstaining and mounting of the slides.

Environmental agents (xenobiotics) that are injurious to cells trigger a spectrum of responses that can range from cell death to adaptation, repair, and proliferation. Cell death, in turn, can take the form of apoptosis (a programmed form of cell death). Xenobiotics have been implicated in toxic cell injury, among them free radicals (nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon derivatives) are known to interact with cellular constituents including membrane lipids and chromagen materials.

Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxic: Toxic to cells, cell-toxic, cell-killing. Any agent or process that kills cells. The prefix cyto- denotes a cell. It comes from the Greek “kytos” meaning hollow, as a cell or container. Toxic is from the Greek “toxikon” = arrow poison.

In nutshell, cell cytotoxicity refers to the ability of certain chemicals or mediator cells to destroy living cells. By using a cytotoxic compound, healthy living cells can either be induced to undergo necrosis (accidental cell death) or apoptosis (programmed cell death).

Measuring cytotoxicity can prove to be very valuable tool in identifying compounds that might pose certain health risks in humans and animals. Cytotoxicity assays are widely used by pharmaceutical industry to screen for cytotoxicity in compound libraries from initial high-throughput drug screens for unwanted cytotoxicity. This can be of vital importance and prove to be quite indispensable during research phase of developing therapeutic new pharmaceutical products to ensure the safety of end-users. Additionally, understanding the mechanisms involved in cytotoxicity can likewise give researchers a more in-depth knowledge on the biological processes (both normal and abnormal) governing cell growth, cell proliferation and death. Compounds that have cytotoxic effects often compromise cell membrane integrity. Therefore, assessing cell membrane integrity is one of the most common ways to measure cell viability and cytotoxic effects. There are three commonly used methods which can be employed to assess in vitro cytotoxicity (disruption of cell integrity) in cell cultures:

Safety is a prime concern for humans and animals. Without evaluating the safety of a chemical, no regulatory authority in the world allows the chemical to be used by humans. There are stipulated guidelines for toxicity evaluations. Among the toxicity assays genotoxicity assays are important and have occupied centre stage due to increase in understanding of the genome.

Genotoxicity describes the property of chemical agents to damage the genetic information within a cell to cause mutations, which may even lead to cancer. While genotoxicity is often confused with mutagenicity, all mutagens are genotoxic; however, not all genotoxic substances are mutagenic. Generally and depending on the agent, a cytotoxic agent may be genotoxic (causing DNA damage), mutagenic (causing gene mutation) or it may be harmful for cell organelles (e.g. cell membrane) or it may even be teratogenic. Therefore, every cytotoxic agent is not genotoxic.

Why we Need to Evaluate Genotoxicity?

Toxicity can be at any level according to the nature of chemicals and type of exposure. Duration of toxicity can also be short lived or long lived within a generation or continue to next generation. Genotoxicity effects are able to continue in next generation(s), in which the exposed population may not suffer seriously but the next generation may suffer without being exposed to the same chemicals. Therefore, genotoxicity evaluations need serious attention.

The concept of single cell micro-gel electrophoresis (SCGE)/comet assay is f irst introduced by Ostling and Johanson (1984) as a method to measure DNA single-strand breaks under neutral conditions. Singh et al. (1988) modified this technique by using alkaline conditions (>13 pH) of electrophoresis, which enabled detection of not only frank strands breaks but also alkali labile sites, DNA cross- linking and incomplete excision repair sites. Now-a-days, this technique is extensively used to study the genotoxic effects of various chemicals. The advantages of SCGE technique include: (1) collection of data at the level of individual cell, allowing for more robust types of statistical analysis; (2) need for small number of cells per sample (<10,000); (3) its sensitivity for detecting DNA damage; and (4) that virtually any eukaryotic cell population is amenable to analysis. The idea is to combine DNA gel electrophoresis with fluorescence microscopy to visualize migration of DNA strands from individual agarose-embedded cells. If the negatively charged DNA contained breaks, DNA supercoils are relaxed and broken ends are able to migrate toward the anode during a brief electrophoresis. If the DNA is undamaged, the lack of free ends and large size of the fragments prevented migration. Determination of the relative amount of DNA that migrated provided a simple way to measure the number of DNA breaks in an individual cell.

Genotoxic effects of any xenobiotics in PMNC and splenocytes of Wistar rats can be studied according to the working protocol of Dhawan et al.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (dUTP) nick end labeling (TUNEL) is a method for detecting DNA fragmentation by labeling the terminal end of nucleic acids. TUNEL is a common method for detecting DNA fragmentation that results from apoptotic signaling cascades. The assay relies on the presence of nicks in DNA which can be identified by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase or TdT, an enzyme that will catalyze the addition of dUTPs that are secondarily labeled with a marker. Here we perform the apoptotic assay test by TUNEL assay kit to identify the apoptotic property of any agent or chemical after treatment of primary cells culture at different concentration as per protocol provided with TUNEL Assay Kit and apoptotic cells are identified by using fluorescent microscope. Detailed procedure of TUNEL assay is as follows:

1. Preparation of primary cells culture as described in earlier methods.

2. Induction of apoptosis in primary cells culture is done by treatment of primary cells culture with different concentration of xenobiotics and incubation in CO2 incubator for 12 h as mentioned in micronuclei assay method.

3. The positive and negative control cells provided with the kit are already f ixed. However, negative control cells are prepared from control sample with absence of inducing agent.

4. Cell Fixation: Cell fixation is a required step in the TUNEL assay and it is done according to the procedure mentioned in the supplied kit by using paraformaldehyde solution. Suspend 1–2 × 106 cells (treated) in 0.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the cell suspension into 5 ml of 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS and place on ice for 15 minutes.

5. Centrifuge the cells for 5 minutes at 300 × g and discard the supernatant.

Injudicious and indiscriminate use of several agrochemicals viz. pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, dyes and medicaments in the field of agriculture and veterinary practices threatens the human and animal population for the toxicity of these environmental deterrents. These agrochemicals have been associated with several episodes of accidental poisoning and mortality among human and animal population. The episode of Mass ethion poisoning in Gujarat is one of the commonest example of inclusion of pesticides or agrochemicals in the environmental pollutants. There are modern tools to evaluate and analyze these chemicals in the environmental pollutants of human and animal use. The sensitivity of these modern highly sophisticated tools has now immensely changed the analytical environmental pollutants industry. Gas chromatography and Mass Spectrophotometry i.e. (GC-MS) technique is employed to detect the volatile residues from environmental pollutants. Whereas, High performance liquid chromatography i.e. HPLC is employed to analyse and detect non volatile drug residues. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) instrument separates chemical mixtures (the GC component) and identifies the components at a molecular level (the MS component). It is one of the most accurate tools for analyzing environmental samples.

Flow Cytometry is a tool used to detect and measure chemicophysical characteristics of a population of cellular particles. Modern day biomedical research needs the molecular assembly of tools to proceed in the advent of biomedical research with real time diagnostic, prognostic and experimental detection of markers. For the same, a naïve tool is flow cytometry. In this technique, a sample having cells or particles is suspended into a fluid and injected into instrument. The ability to perform these measurements in a very rapid time span is one of the key advantages of the flow cytometry process. A single-cell suspension must first be prepared in order to analyse solid Tissues. A flow cytometer is look alike to microscope, except that, instead of producing an image of the cell, it generally offers a cell-by-cell basis high-throughput, automated quantification of specified optical parameters.

They can quantify up to three to six properties or components are quantitated in a single sample, cell by cell, for about 10,000 cells, in less than one minute. Sample is focused to ideally flow one cell at a time through a laser beam, where the light scattered is characteristic to the cells and their components. These cells are tagged with fluorescent markers in order to absorb the light and then emitted them in the form of band of wavelengths. Average ten thousand cells can be quickly examined and the data gathered are processed by a computer.

Isolated tissue preparations are widely used in physiological or pharmaco logical research to delineate the mechanism of action of drugs or any active biomolecules. Traditionally it is used as a tool for bioassay of drugs. The tissue used for such pharmacodynamics studies may be isolated from different animal models viz. frog, rodents, rabbits, sheep, goat, buffalo, chicken etc. Evaluation of drug-receptor interaction and underlying mechanism of action is then performed using isolated organ bath or myograph where the isolated tissues are mounted under optimum resting tension and changes in the tension following exposure of drug is recorded with the help of recording device. With the advancement of science and technology, the recording devices are also gradually upgraded from smoked drum to student’s physiograph to the most advanced Data Acquisition System (DAS) based polyphysiograph.

The isolated tissue preparations (uterine strips, arterial rings, tracheal chains etc.) need essential and appropriate nutrients and environment during experimental which is generally provided by using suitable salt solutions (Physiological Salt Solutions) which provide ionic balance, energy supply, maintain pH and tissue tonicity. The composition of physiological salt solutions is such that it provides an artificial media simulating with the inorganic composition of blood plasma together with a buffer mechanism to maintain an optimum pH of 7.0 to 7.4 and glucose to facilitate tissue metabolism. Commonly used PSS are Frog ringers, tyrode, Kreb’s, de Jalon, Ringer-Locke, modified Kreb’s Henseleit solution etc.

Isolation of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Chemicals

1. Heparin

2. Sterile PBS (pH 7.2)

3. Histopaque-1077

4. RPMI-1640 Media

Protocol

Collect 5 ml of blood from the animal in 1 ml (20 IU/ml of blood) of diluted heparin and add 2 ml of PBS. Layer over the diluted blood on 5 ml of histopaque-1077 in 15 ml centrifuge tube and centrifuge at 1500 rpm for 40 min. Collect the buffy coat at the interface of plasma and histopaque in separate centrifuge tubes. Wash the cells thrice with PBS and suspended in 2 ml of RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Determine the percentage cell viability by 0.1% trypan blue exclusion test, using hemocytometer. Finally dilute the cell suspension to 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium.

Epididymal Total Sperm Count

The epididymal sperm is obtained as described above, incubated at 35°C, which is the optimum temperature of rat epididymal sperm. The epididymal f luid is then diluted to a volume of 5 mL of pre-warmed (32°C) the spermatozoa are counted by hemocytometer using the Improved Neubaur (Deep 1/10mm. LABART, Germany) chamber as described by Pant and Srivastava (2003).

Total viable cell/ml = (Average number of sperm per chamber) x 103 x (Dilution Factor)

Liveability and abnormal sperm

Per cent live spermatozoa is estimated by differential staining technique using Eosin-Nigrosin stain (NE) (Campbell et al., 1953). These slides are also used for estimating the per cent abnormal sperm morphologically on the basis of observable abnormalities of head, neck, mid-piece and trail region of the spermatozoa.

The percent live spermatozoa are determined adopting the differential staining technique using Eosin-Nigrosin stain.

• A drop of epididymal semen is taken on a clean, grease free pre warmed glass slide.

• 4-5 drops of Eosin-Nigrosine stain (1% Eosin and 5% Nigrosine in 3% sodium citrate dehydrate solution) is placed near the semen drop.

• Epididymal semen and stain are mixed gently using a blunt fine glass rod.

• After 30 seconds to 1 minute a thin smear is made on a clean, grease free glass slide.

• The smear is examined under oil immersion objective.