eChapters

12.1 Active Packaging: Types, Mechanisms, and Applications • Antimicrobial Packaging: This type contains substances such as organic acids, enzymes, or metals like silver nanoparticles to prevent microbial growth, thus prolonging shelf life ( Ma, Q et al .2021) • Oxygen Scavengers: These absorb oxygen to minimize oxidation and spoilage, often used in snacks, baked goods, and meats. • Moisture Control: Packaging features absorbent materials or humidity regulating films to keep moisture levels optimal, particularly in fresh produce. • Ethylene Scavengers: These helps slow down the ripening process in fruits and vegetables by reducing ethylene gas levels. • CO? Emitters: These generate carbon dioxide to inhibit microbial growth, particularly useful in certain food products (Yildirim et al., 2018) 12.2 Mechanis

Packaging machinery is a critical component in the food industry, enabling the efficient and consistent packaging of food products while maintaining safety, quality, and freshness. From automated filling and sealing systems to advanced inspection and labeling machines, packaging machinery plays a pivotal role in delivering food products to consumers in optimal condition. The machinery used in food packaging is designed to handle various product types, from solid and liquid foods to powders and granular items, each requiring specific handling, filling, and sealing techniques. In an industry where speed, hygiene, and precision are paramount, packaging machinery has evolved to include sophisticated features such as robotics, computer-controlled systems, and sensors that monitor critical parameters like weight, temperature, and fill levels. These innovations help manufacturers improve productivity, reduce waste, and ensure that food products meet regulatory standards and consumer expectations.

The packaging requirements for food products are as varied as the foods themselves, with each category necessitating unique materials and design considerations to ensure product quality, safety, and consumer satisfaction. Packaging serves as the first line of defense against environmental factors like moisture, light, oxygen, and microbial contamination, which can significantly impact food stability and shelf life. The role of packaging extends beyond mere protection; it also contributes to preserving texture, flavor, and nutritional value, making it a crucial factor in the overall success of a food product. Chapter 10 delves into the specialized needs of different food types—such as bread and bakery items, snacks, dairy products, coffee, and carbonated beverages—analyzing the packaging materials, structural designs, and technologies required to maintain product integrity. The food industry faces the complex challenge of balancing protective packaging with considerations for sustainability, consumer convenience, and regulatory compliance. This has led to the evolution of advanced

Permeability is a fundamental concept in food packaging, shaping the protective capabilities of packaging materials by determining the extent to which gases and vapors can move through them. This property plays a crucial role in preserving food freshness, safety, and quality by controlling the interaction between the food product and its surrounding environment. Understanding permeability is essential in designing packaging solutions tailored to the specific requirements of different food products, as improper permeability can lead to accelerated spoilage, nutrient degradation, and undesirable changes in texture and flavor. In this chapter, we explore the science of permeability in food packaging, breaking down its core principles, the behavior of different gases and vapors in various packaging materials, and the factors influencing permeability. Additionally, we examine how permeability impacts shelf life and consumer satisfaction, offering insights into selecting materials for specific food types. By understanding and manipulating permeability, food manufacturers can develop packaging that optimally balances protection and breathability, extending product shelf life and ensuring quality

Aseptic packaging is a specialized and advanced method used to extend the shelf life of perishable foods without the need for refrigeration. This technique involves sterilizing both the food product and the packaging material separately and then filling and sealing the product in a sterile environment. Aseptic packaging has transformed the food industry, allowing products such as dairy, juices, soups, and sauces to remain fresh and safe at room temperature for extended periods. The ability to maintain product quality, nutritional value, and safety while reducing reliance on cold storage has made aseptic packaging a preferred choice in both food manufacturing and distribution. The process of aseptic packaging is both complex and precise, as it requires thorough sterilization of every component to ensure food safety. Packaging materials, typically a combination of paper, plastic, and aluminum, are carefully selected to withstand high temperatures while providing an effective barrier against contamination. This chapter explores the principles of aseptic packaging, its significance in food preservation, and the advanced technologies and materials used to achieve and maintain sterility in packaged foods.

The growing concern over the environmental impact of traditional packaging has led to increased interest in biodegradable and edible packaging solutions. These innovative approaches offer sustainable alternatives to conventional materials like plastic, which can persist in the environment for hundreds of years. Biodegradable packaging decomposes naturally, reducing pollution and landfill waste, while edible packaging provides an additional layer of sustainability by allowing consumers to eat the packaging along with the food) These solutions not only address waste management issues but also respond to changing consumer preferences for environmentally friendly products. This chapter explores the importance of sustainable packaging, the different types of biodegradable and edible materials available, and the challenges and future potential of these eco-friendly options.

Lamination and coating techniques are integral to modern food packaging, providing additional layers of protection, functionality, and appeal to the packaging materials. These techniques enhance barrier properties, improve durability, and enable packaging to withstand a range of environmental and mechanical stresses. Lamination typically involves bonding multiple layers of materials to achieve specific characteristics, such as moisture resistance, heat stability, and strength. Coating, on the other hand, adds a surface layer that can enhance properties like grease resistance, sealability, and printability. This chapter explores the various lamination and coating techniques used in food packaging, examining their applications, benefits, and potential limitations.

The choice of packaging materials is fundamental to the effectiveness, sustainability, and appeal of food packaging. Different materials offer distinct properties and functionalities, from providing a secure barrier against contaminants to enhancing convenience for consumers. Packaging materials are categorized based on their characteristics, including flexibility, rigidity, and barrier capabilities, each suited for particular types of food products and storage conditions. In recent years, there has also been a shift toward more sustainable materials, such as biodegradable and recyclable options, reflecting growing environmental concerns and regulatory pressures. This chapter explores the various types of packaging materials used in the food industry, examining their benefits, limitations, and applications. By understanding the unique properties of each material, we can better appreciate how they contribute to the protection, preservation, and presentation of food products.

Food packaging serves to protect products throughout their journey from production to consumption. However, packaging is often exposed to a variety of hazards during transportation and storage that can compromise its effectiveness and, ultimately, the quality and safety of the food inside. Understanding these hazards is essential for designing packaging solutions that can withstand the physical, environmental, and atmospheric challenges encountered along the supply chain. This chapter examines the types of hazards that affect food packaging during transportation and storage, focusing on the ways in which these factors impact packaging integrity, food quality, and consumer safety. By exploring mechanical hazards, environmental influences, and atmospheric interactions, this chapter provides insights into the crucial role that resilient packaging plays in safeguarding food from production to point-of-sale.

The packaging requirements for food products go beyond mere containment. Effective packaging must serve multiple functions, such as protecting food from physical and environmental hazards, providing convenience to consumers, and acting as a medium for communication and branding. Each requirement is essential to ensure food quality, safety, and longevity, as well as to meet consumer expectations and regulatory standards. As food products vary in their characteristics and shelf-life requirements, packaging must be tailored to suit these specific needs while also considering factors like transportation, storage, and market positioning. This chapter delves into the fundamental requirements of food packaging, examining the functional roles that packaging plays across various product categories. By understanding these requirements and functions, we can appreciate the complexity of designing effective food packaging that fulfills multiple roles in the modern food supply chain

Packaging is not only an integral part of product presentation but also plays a vital role in preserving food quality and extending its shelf life. In a world where food must travel vast distances from producers to consumers, often across varying climates and storage conditions, effective packaging is essential. It serves multiple functions, from protecting food against physical, chemical, and biological hazards to providing a medium for branding, regulatory compliance, and consumer convenience. This chapter explores the fundamental need for packaging in the food industry, emphasizing how packaging contributes to the safety, longevity, and accessibility of food products. By examining the protection, preservation, distribution, and sustainability aspects of packaging, this chapter highlights its significance in modern food production and distribution systems. 2.1. Protection, Preservation

In today’s global food industry, packaging has evolved into an essential component that extends beyond basic containment. The rapid expansion of food distribution networks and increasing consumer demand for quality, convenience, and safety have transformed packaging into a sophisticated, multi functional system. Food packaging now serves critical roles in preservation, safety, marketing, and sustainability, aligning with both global and regional standards that cater to a wide array of consumer needs. This chapter provides an overview of the importance of food packaging, discusses the current landscape in both global and Indian markets, identifies key trends and challenges, and explores packaging’s role in the modern food supply chain. Each section aims to illustrate how food packaging impacts food quality, longevity, and overall consumer satisfaction, highlighting the industry’s ongoing innovations and adaptations to regulatory and environmental concerns. 1.1 Definition and Significance of Food Packaging Definit

Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the top global public health threats. It is estimated that bacterial AMR was directly responsible for 1.27 million global deaths in 2019 and contributed to 4.95 million deaths (Murray et al., 2019).Despite its magnitude, public awareness of AMR remains low. Unlike tobacco smoke, antibiotics are potentially life-saving medications, but it is just as vital to understand the risks of overuse and their impact on future effectiveness in society as a whole (Langfordet al., 2019). Effective risk communication is essential to addressing AMR because it not only informs professional and community stakeholders but also nurturesbehaviour change across sectors. Within a One Health framework, risk communication connects human medicine, veterinary practice, agriculture, and environmental management, ensuring coordinated responses to reduce misuse and overuse of antimicrobials. This article explores the role of risk communication in combating AMR, highlighting global lessons, challenges, and strategies to strengthen communication systems for sustainable containment.
The Growing Threat of AMR
AMR occurs when microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites evolve mechanisms to resist drugs that once effectively treated them. Misuse and overuse of antimicrobials in human health, livestock, aquaculture, and crop production accelerate resistance. According to WHO, AMR is projected to cause 10 million deaths annually by 2050 if left unaddressed (O’Neill, 2016). In countries like India, with high infectious disease burdens and large-scale antimicrobial consumption, the risks are particularly acute. Communicating these risks clearly and effectively is critical for influencing prescribing practices, agricultural use, and community awareness.Persistent misconceptions include beliefs that antibiotics are effective against viral illnesses and the mistaken notion that it is the human body, rather than bacteria, that develops resistance (Muflihet al., 2021). These knowledge gaps are often linked to insufficient or ineffective health communication (Krockowet al., 2023), sparse media coverage compared to threats like sepsis (Fitzpatrick et al., 2019).
Challenges in AMR Risk Communication
1. Low Public Awareness: Despite the global severity ofAMR, public awareness remains critically low. Surveys have found that a mere fraction of the population grasp its implications, with some reporting only ~8–11% demonstrating adequate understanding and many feeling powerless to contribute (Goshaet al., 2024).
2. Ineffective understanding of Terminology: It is recognized that AMR has a ‘language problem’ and the way in which healthcare professionals communicate about AMR may not always resonate with patients (Langford et al., 2019). Technical labels like “AMR” or “antimicrobial resistance” fall short in public communication. Experiments reveal that phrases such as “Antibiotic Resistance” or “Antibiotic Crisis” are more memorable and better at promoting critical behaviors—like completing prescribed antibiotic courses—than more formal terminology.
3. Misconceptions about Antibiotics: Widespread misunderstandings persist regarding antibiotics’ purpose and effect. Many incorrectly believe antibiotics treat viruses—common colds, flu, or even are effective painkillers (Gunasekara et al., 2022).Some think AMR occurs because the body becomes resistant, rather than bacteria evolving resistance(Muflihet al., 2021).
4. Complexity of the Issue: AMR is inherently multifaceted—spanning interactions among humans, animals, and the environment—which makes it challenging to distill into clear, actionable messages. Understanding Risk

Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the most alarming public health challenges of the 21st century, threatening the effectiveness of life-saving drugs and the future of modern medicine. This crisis is not limited to healthcare settings; it spans communities, agriculture, and the environment, impacting every facet of society. India, with its large population, high burden of infectious diseases, unregulated access to antibiotics, and considerable pharmaceutical manufacturing industry, stands at the forefront of the global struggle against AMR. The rise of resistant microbes stems from a complex interplay of factors: overuse and misuse of antibiotics in humans and animals, poor infection prevention practices, lack of sanitation, and environmental contamination from antibiotic waste. As a result, common infections are becoming harder to treat, surgical procedures riskier, and healthcare costs are escalating, all leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Tackling AMR requires robust intersectoral collaboration—no single stakeholder can succeed alone. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industries, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives form a critical triad in India’s fight against AMR. NGOs drive grassroots education, advocacy, surveillance, and policy change, often bridging gaps where governmental capacity is limited. The pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, responsible for antibiotic manufacturing, distribution, stewardship, and infection control, play a pivotal role in curbing environmental emissions, supporting responsible use, and promoting the discovery of new treatments. Meanwhile, CSR channels the resources and expertise of corporations towards sustainable, communityfacing projects that promote awareness, improve hygiene, foster stewardship, and drive systemic change.

Introduction
Animal sector is growing very fast particularly in India as people’s purchasing power is increasing day by day. With increase in income, people’s dietary habit is shifting towards more animal origin products. The use of antibiotics for animal food production is growing very fast and India is the 4th largest country in the world regarding consumption of antibiotics in veterinary and animal husbandry sector. There is urgent need of AMR mitigation strategies to reduce the effect on human and animal health. As per the World Bank AMR can affect the global GDP upto 3.8% by 2050. Most of the countries in the world are very cautious regarding antibiotic residues and rejecting the livestock products which lead to economic loss. Many world agencies/forum such as CodexAMR Guidelines, UN Political Declaration on AMR Guidelines, Global Leaders Group on AMR reiterated judicious use of antibiotics. All-India Network Project on AMR inLivestock and Fisherieswas started in India to reduce the effect of AMR by educational awareness, adoption at field level, surveillance system and diagnosis but it didn’t meet out the desired outcome. Capacity building programmes in the field of AMR by training, reform in curriculum, collaboration from different fields of professionals can mitigate the harmful effect of AMR. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), education and training play pivotal roles in translating knowledge into practical implementation, warranting the inclusion of Antimicrobial Use and AMR as integral components in professional education, postgraduate training, and continuing education within the food and agricultural sectors Training Strategies It involve Antimicrobial Stewardship training for healthcare professionals, public awareness campaigns, farmer education, and veterinary training on responsible antimicrobial use. Other critical elements include fostering collaboration through professional networks, building surveillance capacity, utilizing AI-driven tools for better decision-making, and promoting hygiene and infection prevention to reduce infection incidence and the need for antibiotics.
Training for Healthcare Professionals
There is substantial evidence that both healthcare workers and members of the public have knowledge gaps about appropriate use of antibiotics and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Surveillance is a prerequisite to estimate the magnitude of the AMR burden and to establish any intervention strategies, such as antimicrobial stewardship. In order to launch successful intervention approaches through cooperative efforts from different stakeholders (e.g., international agencies, human and veterinary medicine sectors, agriculture and animal production industries, and consumers), the existing knowledge gap needs to be addressed first.

Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the most pressing global health threats, with implications that extend beyond human medicine to animal health, food security, and the environment. In livestock production systems, the misuse and overuse of antibiotics contribute significantly to the development of resistant pathogens. These resistant organisms can spread from animals to humans through direct contact, contaminated food products, and environmental pathways. The containment of AMR in livestock is not solely a technical or regulatory challenge—it is also a social and behavioral issue. Public awareness, education, and behavioural change are key pillars of any effective AMR mitigation strategy. Schools, community networks, and media platforms play vital roles in shaping knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to antibiotic use in livestock.
Causes of AMR in Livestock
Over-prescription and misuse of antibiotics in veterinary care Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters rather than for therapeutic purposes Poor farm bio-security and hygiene leading to frequent infections
Inadequate regulation and over-the-counter sale of antibiotics without veterinary oversight
Public Health Impact
Transmission of resistant pathogens via the food chain Contamination of soil and water with resistant genes through manure
Emergence of zoonotic diseases with limited treatment options

Introduction
AMR is a critical global problem that affects human, environmental, and animal health. AMR is a complex problem; it is necessary to look at it from different disciplines to frame it within the One Health approach [Shrestha,2018].The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified AMR as a top ten global public health threat.Globally, there were an estimated 4.95 million deaths associated with bacterial AMR in 2019, including 1.27 million deaths attributable to bacterial AMR [O’Neill, J. (2016)]. The economic impact is equally alarming. The World Bank projects that AMR could lead to an additional US$ 1 trillion in healthcare costs by 2050, and over US$ 1 trillion in annual gross domestic product (GDP) losses by 2030.The One Health approach is defined as a joint effort of various disciplines that come together to provide solutions for human, animal, and environmental health. AMR is linked to each of these three components due to the irresponsible and excessive use of antimicrobials in various sectors (agriculture, cattle raising, and human medicine). Under the pressure of antimicrobial selection, bacteria acquire resistance genes and mobile genetic elements that can spread to other bacteria of the same or different genus. When bacteria acquire resistance to antimicrobials, they also acquire a greater ability to proliferate in animals, humans, and the natural world. Mismanagement of antimicrobials, inadequate infection control, agricultural debris, contaminants in the environment, and migration of people and animals infected with resistant bacteria facilitate the spread of resistance [Collignon,et.,al,2018]. AMR represents a global public health problem, for which epidemiological surveillance systems have been established, aiming to promote collaborations directed at the well-being of human and ani mal health and the balance of the ecosystem. Several international organizations (The World Organisation for Animal Health [OIE], WHO, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]) have joined forces to develop a Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance-WHO. Action taken in this plan included understanding the AMR from surveillance and research. The advisory group established guidelines for AMR surveillance to ensure all countries implement integrated surveillance, which will cover the use and consumption of antimicrobials in the human and animal population. These guide lines will provide a clear understanding of how AMR spreads in different settings and specific areas. It will allow to study the correlation between AMR and antimicrobial use in a different setting (animals, humans, and environment) and to assess the effect of interventions within and between sectors [W.H.O 2015,2017].

Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasingly recognised as a “silent pandemic,” threatening global health and development. In 2019 alone, bacterial AMR was directly responsible for 1.27 million deaths and contributed to nearly 5 million more worldwide. Projections warn that by 2050, unchecked AMR could result in 10 million annual deaths and impose a staggering economic burden of USD 100 trillion. A major driver of this crisis is the indiscriminate and often prophylactic use of antibiotics in livestock production systems, which account for a majority of global antimicrobial consumption. The One Health framework—emphasising the interconnectedness of animal, human, and environmental health—offers a strategic pathway for mitigating AMR. It requires dismantling sectoral silos and fostering collaboration among veterinarians, physicians, public health authorities, food safety regulators, and environmental scientists. Against this backdrop, NDDB has positioned itself as a frontrunner in India by embedding One Health principles into large-scale field programmes. Since 2014, NDDB has progressively promoted alternative medicine for bovine mastitis control under its Mastitis Conrol Project (MCP), subsequently expanding in 2017–18 into a broader Disease Control through Alternate Methods (DCAM) project with Ethnoveterinary Medicine (EVM) as the central pillar.
Building Up: From DCAM to DISHA as One Health Strategy
Building on the successes of MCP, DCAM, and BCP, NDDB launched the Dairy Integrated Safety and Health Action (DISHA) project for 2025–2030, DISHA consolidates NDDB’s One Health strategy by combining animal health management, zoonotic disease surveillance, and food safety monitoring. Its objectives include: managing bovine cases with EVM, organising farmer awareness programmes, training veterinarians and health workers, screening cattle as well as their owner for brucellosis, and testing bulk milk samples for aflatoxins and antibiotic residues. Importantly, DISHA also addresses emerging food system contaminants such as microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs), Bisphenol-A (BPA) and heavy metals, thereby broadening the scope of One Health beyond infectious diseases.

Introduction
It is reasonable to consider that the history of humanity has been marked by two transformational revolutions: the cognitive revolution (35,000 to 70,000 years ago), when Homo sapiens began to manifest our capacity to abstract, imagine things that did not exist and give meaning to non-representational thoughts; the agricultural revolution (10,000 to 12,000 years ago), when Homo sapiens stopped being a hunter/collector to settle on land, cultivating the soil and raising domesticated animals. It was possibly the beginning of property ownership, monogamy, family and also when malaria, and other diseases more easily spread in communities, became consolidated as human diseases. It was with the cognitive revolution that things changed and our previously acquired abilities of creating images and dealing with abstract concepts started to push humankind to become the “Dominant Mammal” controlling all other animals and Earth’s environments. Progressively, man learned to work with wood, iron and all minerals extracted from the soil, produced clothes with leather and wool from animals, linen and cotton from plants, silk from insects, and latter from natural oils created arts, jewellery, dynamite, electricity, vaccines, transatlantic ships, locomotives, cars, computers, antibiotics, contraceptives, robots, portable cell phones, informatics, bioengineering, internet, artificial intelligence, social networks and many other innovations . Not surprisingly, conscious of all these attributes, man felt important, central and essential, falling into the temptation of judging himself a magnificent creature with all rights and that became deep rooted in some cultures. For the pleasure,comfort, sophistication and power, man interfered with and altered the environment in a so ambitious and predatory manner that he modified and compromised his and other species living conditions, causing also climate changes that threaten his own survival on the planet. With time, it became clear that, in addition to this entirely anthropocentric “Ego’s” point of view, there might be another perspective fromwhich one can perceive the world and interact with it. An ecological “Eco’s” perspective corresponds to a compassionate view (how can we contribute to the greater good and make the world a better place) of the Globe. After all the damage done to nature by man, moving from the socalled Ego to the Eco attitude became a mandatory needConcerning Global Health, for a long-time, human health has benefited by sacrificing the “health” of wild ecosystems (e.g., deforestation and conversion of wilderness to farmland, damming of water for irrigation, destruction of swamps and dislocation and jeopardy of wild species) which reflects a protectionist vs utilitarian conflict, over the question of whether to put human domination of the biosphere on hold or whether to embrace it .It hides unaddressed concerns about the value of (macroscopic) life (human, animal or plant), the definitions of health and wellbeing (human, animal, plant and environmental) and their relative importance. This has hampered the development and acceptance of a One Health (OH) understanding of Global Health.

Our animal companions are our family members. We want the best for them and want them to be healthy and happy. However, just as it is with everyone else, our companion animals can also fall ill and suffer from emotions such as grief, fear, and anxiety. And while we follow all expert medical advice, sometimes we may wish for something more – something that will make life easier for them as well as us. This is where the concept of energy healing for animals comes in – to comfort and support our animal companions. With joy, we watch them relax with a sigh; we see our nervous dogs calm down, and those recovering from an acute illness get back on their paws in no time. Energy healing for animals involves a holistic approach to ensure the physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being of our animal friends. It is based on the fundamental concept that just like us, our animal companions too have a subtle energy layer, and they too have vital life-force energies or Prana or Qi. And just like us, they, too, have chakras and meridians through which the Qi flows. Energy healing is a set of powerful techniques practiced to calm and restore the balance of the body. This system is largely based on the removal of energetic blocks and helps restore the body’s energy levels. It is crucial for those living with companion animals to understand the importance of energy healing for their animal companions, as it encompasses a broad range of alternative and complementary therapies designed to support the natural healing process of animals. Here are some proven, popular, non-invasive energy healing techniques that bring relief and comfort to companion animals.
1. Animal Reiki: The word Reiki means “mystical energy.” The system of Reiki for healing was revealed by Japanese Buddhist practitioner Mikao Usui in the early 1900s. And while it was initially meant for humans, practitioners soon discovered that animals responded much more swiftly and effectively to this gentle, non-invasive energy work.
2. EFT Tapping: This involves tapping on specific points on the body to free up emotional blocks. EFT Tapping for animals brings powerful transformations when an animal is struggling with emotional distress, such as grief over the loss of a loved human or animal.
3. Scalar Wave Healing: Scalar Wave was discovered in the 1900s by James Maxwell and later Nicolas Tesla. Scalar Wave harnesses the healing power of high vibrational frequencies meeting to create a standing wave, and practitioners use this to bring about healing at a cellular level.
4. Shamanic Healing: In this ancient technique, practitioners work with the elements of nature, such as plants, trees, and stones, as well as beings in other dimensions, to bring about healing. Shamanic healing can reach beyond space and time and has been very effective in releasing old trauma or emotions that are often hidden beneath layers of survival mechanisms.
5. Healing Mantra: Ayurveda, the Indian system of medicine, advocates about different types of Chikitsa. Daivavyapashraya Chikitsa is one of the treatment approaches concerned with Spiritual way of treatment. It includes so many approaches, amongst all Mantra Chikitsa is described in Ayurveda at various places as a potent approach. It is discussed for both the healthy and unhealthy conditions. Mantra comes from Sanskrit word which means sacred message or text, spell. The word Mantra is derived from Man+Tra, man—mananaat---just by chanting and tra—trayate---- we can protect ourselves. Means, just by chanting one can save himself in the universe. i.e. it is saved from onset of disturbances. Mantras are the words loaded with power and sounds capable of penetrating our body into deep levels. Mantra chikitsa is the ancient science originated from Vedas, this is a parallel science to Ayurveda also called alternative medicine system.Mantra Chikitsa is one among the Daivavyapashraya Chikitsa highlights the importance of concept of Mantra. In Atharva Veda and Kaushikasutra, the two most ancient and authentic sources of Daivavyapashraya. Mantra Chikitsa is mainly used for both preventive and curative aspect. It is also used for the enhancement of the Gunas of Aushadhi. Effect of Mantra is described as Prabhavajanya action. Prabhava means the specific and characteristic action of substances, it is called as Acintya. Mantra Chikitsa cure the Karmaja Vyadhi and Agantuja Vyadhi. In the Vedic period, Daivavyapashraya Chikitsa was followed in various rituals.